User talk:L8webber!2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gspinty1 (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Gspinty1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero G coffee cup (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Reply

I've moved your request to the bottom of the talk page where it should be. Please don't post the same request on multiple page, it just annoys people. I'm surprised you created a draft without waiting for an answer.

Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
  • Most of your text is unsourced, and therefore pointless. As for the few "references" you do give, please read what an independent source is. Your sources are pages closely associated with him, featuring him, quoting him and his own patent. A patent doesn't confer notability and isn't, obviously, independent of him.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • Unsourced or inappropriately sourced opinions presented as facts include first patent for an object invented in space first legal invention from off Earth... enabling astronauts to drink liquids more naturally... has added quality of life to the daily routines of astronauts by allowing them to enjoy beverages more naturally... provided scientific insights into fluid dynamics... contributing to the broader understanding of how liquids behave in space.

This is an interesting topic and may be notable, but you can't just write down stuff without sources or to sites that are quoting him and expect it to be accepted. The fact that you make totally unsourced claims about its impact just comes across as promo too. It's best to look for sources and then write an article around the facts you can verify, rather than to slap down some text with a couple of links that mention the product, but aren't actuially indepednet third-party sources Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

I'll tweak it more and try again, thanks Gspinty1 (talk) 21:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero G Coffee Cup (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Donald Pettit. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of this is already covered in Pettit's article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 20:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero G Coffee Cup (September 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: You've already been reminded all the details of this has been covered in Donald Pettit. I'm boldly rejecting this draft to prevent another resubmission, which will likely be declined for the same reason.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 06:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Zero G Cup moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zero G Cup. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️✉️📔) 07:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Zero G Coffee Cup

Information icon Hello, Gspinty1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zero G Coffee Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zero G Coffee Cup

Hello, Gspinty1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zero G Coffee Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero G Cup (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Donald Pettit. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The draft was already declined under different names many times, what makes this one survive an instant deletion?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 06:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Zero G Cup

Information icon Hello, Gspinty1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zero G Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:12, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zero G Cup

Hello, Gspinty1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zero G Cup".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Space Cup has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Space Cup. Thanks! 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 Peep peep! 23:54, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI