User talk:Legal8462

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Solicitor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

If you can't write coherent English, please stick to editing a Wikipedia in your own language. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

check my edit. It's "reliable sources". In Japan section, writer just copy and paste from that page now including "Solicitor". Why not make right text? Legal8462 (talk) 18:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

the editor Imaginatorium reverted Judicial scrivener ‎page without reliable sources. I submitted reliable one^[1] and edited with nothing wrong.Legal8462 (talk) 20:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Shiho-Shoshi is registered as Solicitor since 2007. Here's those English link. I have improved Wikipedia with reliable sources.

^[2][3]Legal8462 (talk) 05:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

残念ながら、あなたの英語力はen:WPには全く十分ではありません。実は、日本司法書士会連合会の英語力も英語ウィキペディアの基準（英語を母語とする人なみ）には満たないでしょう。その連合会のページのタイトルに"solicitor"と言う単語が入っているだけで日本の法律制度がイギリスの制度と同じと考えるのはとんでもない発想です。とにかく、日本での司法書士と弁護士の区別はイギリスの solicitorと barristerとの区別とは違います。トークページで話し合いができないなら、en:WPの編集をやめてください。Imaginatorium (talk) 05:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

何の話し合いですか？司法書士はソリシターとして商標登録されています。あなたは商標権の侵害による懲役10年以下または1000万円以下の罰金に処されますよ？しかも私の編集はほとんどリンクのみです。その他の記載はほかの人がしたものです。私の英語は非常に流暢ですよ。単にあなたがソースを出さない悪質な編集者だというだけです。

Shiho-Shoshi is registered as Solicitor since 2007. Here's those English link. I have improved Wikipedia with "reliable sources". ^[4][5]

If you violate Trademark Act, you are punished in Japanese Law of Trademark Act.

http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=45&vm=04&re=01

Article 78　An infringer of a trademark right or an exclusive right to use (excluding one who has committed an act that shall be deemed to constitute infringement of a trademark right or an exclusive right to use under Article 37 or Article 67) shall be punished by imprisonment with work for a term not exceeding ten years or a fine not exceeding 10,000,000 yen or combination thereof.Legal8462 (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

the editor Imaginatorium reverted some pages without reliable links again and violated Tredemark Act. He also wrote some hatred statement against Shiho-Shoshi. I just add LINKS. And most texts were written by those links or other writers.Legal8462 (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not mark edits as minor when they do not comply with the definition at WP:minor edit. --David Biddulph (talk) 05:46, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

thanks your advice. I approved. By the way, Imaginatorium reverted without reliable sources. It is not allowed in Wikipedia and Trademark Act of Japanese Law. Legal8462 (talk) 05:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

I understand that you are upset about what you allege is misuse of the term 司法書士. User:Imaginatorium, who can read Japanese, will have understood your messages about this, so far as they are understandable.

Now please read Wikipedia:No legal threats. I note your block log at ja:Wikipedia. I trust that you don't want a block log here as well. -- Hoary (talk) 09:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks your understanding. Yes, I follow law and rules on Wikipedia. Additionally, Japanese Trademark Act rules more severe punishment for corporation including Wikipedia Foundation. It can be 3 million dollar fine.

Trademark Act http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=45&vm=04&re=01

Article 82　Where a representative of a juridical person or an agent, employee or other staff member of a juridical person or an individual has committed, in the course of performing social activities for the juridical person or individual, any act in violation of the provisions prescribed in the following items, in addition to the offender, the juridical person shall be punished by fine as provided in the corresponding items and the individual shall be punished by fine as provided in each article prescribed in the following items:

(i)　Article 78, Article 78-2 or 81-2(1),　a fine not exceeding 300 million yen; and

(ii)　Article 79 or 80,　a fine not exceeding 100 million yen.

(2)　In the case of the preceding paragraph, a complaint under Article 81-2(2) against the offender shall also have effect on the juridical person or individual and a complaint against the juridical person or individual shall also have effect on the offender.

(3)　Where a fine is imposed on a judicial person or individual pursuant to paragraph (1) with regard to a violation of Article 78, 78-2 or 81-2(1), the period of prescription shall be governed by the same rules as for crimes in the provisions thereof. Legal8462 (talk) 10:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. - You must withdraw your threat - David Biddulph (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you more information! Yes, I follow those rules. (I introduced those information for favor but OK I don't from now. Legal8462 (talk) 10:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)