User talk:LevatorScapulaeSyndrome

Just to let you know you put Czellos link in DR wrong so it does not link to their page but a redlink to nothing. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 16:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, my mistake, will be correcting it soon :). Thank you for pointing it out. LevatorScapulaeSyndrome (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I am GuesanLoyalist (You are able to call me Loyalist or GL if you wish) and I wanted to ask you on why you undid my edit on the 2025 Iraqi parliamentary election? I mean to reorganize the infobox so it can look neater and be less of a hassle to go into.

It really doesn't make sense to me if I had to be honest but I would like to hear your reasons for doing so.

I am able to ask questions if you wish.

GuesanLoyalist (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi :)

Your edit broke the table and it was just a load of text on the page, you accidentally undid the formatting.

Feel free to re-do it, of course, just make sure it doesn't break the table. I didn't undo it for malicious reasons, dw. It really annoys me how difficult Wikipedia tables are, they're like a horse desperately trying to break its legs at any opportunity. I wish it was just easy and intuitive on visual.

I hope this clears things up, I thought I explained it on the edit summary, but maybe not? Please feel free to re-do the change, I'm sure it was just a small error but I didn't know enough to fix it while keeping your changes so I felt just reverting it was better to avoid having a broken table on the page for ages.

~~ LevatorScapulaeSyndrome (talk) 08:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey no biggie! I was just asking on why you did it. But I think you might be using a different skin of Wikipedia because when I uploaded the reorganisation of the infobox, nothing changed and things seemed normal.

Glad that we could clear some things up though and happy editing!

GuesanLoyalist (talk) 09:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey,

I use the default Wikipedia, I'm not really sure how this or that add-on works. I need to figure that out, especially if there's one that makes visual editing better.

I should've checked on incognito or something to make double sure it wasn't just for me, though, and I'll do that next time.

All the best!

~~ LevatorScapulaeSyndrome (talk) 10:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

All the best for you too! GuesanLoyalist (talk) 11:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Penny Mordaunt, you may be blocked from editing. Given that you're saying it's fair under perennial sources I can assume you've read it so you must therefore be aware Generally Unreliable sources (of which the WP:DAILYEXPRESS clearly is marked) must never be used on BLP articles. Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

I would like to note that I have asked multiple times for you to engage with substance on my talk page. I hope you actually outline your clear and persistent grievance with me in substance rather than this infantile passive aggression. I have asked you to do so multiple times regarding out disagreements over the Your Party page.

I was in the wrong wrt the Penny Mordaunt edit and I apologise. I am happy to admit when I'm wrong, though it is more so just a stupid mistake from me than malicious disruption. LevatorScapulaeSyndrome (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Edited for civility.

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours per page for pages within this topic. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of differences between the former and new systems, see WP:CTVSDS.

Please not that you do not yet have 500 edits and thus should only be using Talk:2026 Iran conflict to make edit requests EvergreenFir (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

That is what I did. LevatorScapulaeSyndrome (talk) 22:19, 2 March 2026 (UTC)