User talk:Limeness

Hello, I'm MakaylaHippo1998. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Buteogallus woodwardi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 07:15, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 15:06, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

I intended this to be about your lack of edit summaries. While occasional lack is fine, doing multiple edits in a row with none is not good, such as your string of edits updating stub tags on a number of paleo-bird articles. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:08, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

A missing edit summary is not a misleading one, those are two completely different issues. Your message is misleading.

Also, I didn't really think it needed to be explained. Explaining edits seems like a waste of time. And it's clear why {{paleo-bird-stub}} needs to be replaced with {{paleo-neornithine-stub}}, in the case of prehistoric neornithine stubs. This is because the former includes non-neornithine avialans and the latter does not. So only Category:Prehistoric neornithine stubs can be in Category:Bird stubs (which is neornithine-exclusive), and Category:Prehistoric bird stubs cannot be in it. This is already explained in Template:Paleo-bird-stub/doc. So I ask why you feel the need to ask me to explain edits which are already explained in a template documentation. Limeness (talk) 00:44, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Quoting WP:FIES: According to the policy on consensus, all edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious)—either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. It is better to err on the side of explaining more than you need to, than not enough. It's a good practice to get into. (Please read WP:EDITSUM (linked in my original notice) and well as WP:FIES.) - UtherSRG (talk) 01:53, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Limeness,

Did you previously edit Wikipedia under the username User:Grey Clownfish or any other accounts? Thank you for providing any information you can to address this question. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

No, why would you think that? Limeness (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

You are editing some of the same articles and you created your account soon after the other editor was blocked from editing which is common with sockpuppets. But I appreciate you answering my query.

If you have any questions about editing on this platform or Wikipedia's policies or practices, please bring them to the Teahouse and experienced editors can provide support and advice. Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:36, 20 February 2026 (UTC)