User talk:Littleclown27
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
July 2025
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Tony Mafia, from its old location at User:Littleclown27. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 10:36, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! 2A02:C7C:9A9E:E800:4500:521B:2103:A9FD (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Mafia (July 19)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tony Mafia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Is it OK to use AI to finetune Articles?
I am enjoying contributing to Wikipedia (specifically in my field of interest in the Arts) and am not shy to admit that I have inquired with ChatGPT to ensure that I reference and cite notable facts in the proper way. Something that as a beginner I did not find very easy to get my head around. The support that AI eventually gave me was not what I thought it would be and many mistakes were made. My question is; is this frowned upon? Happy to change my approach if this is the case. Just making sure I get this right! Thanks. Littleclown27 (talk) 10:28, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Florent Chavouet 1 (July 21)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Florent Chavouet 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Littleclown27!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC) |
- Thanks @Dan arndt - great to hear someone else drafted an article on the same topic. Naturally more than happy to give my draft a miss. Littleclown27 (talk) 12:17, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Genomes.io (July 24)

- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Genomes.io and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Will work on this. Thanks! Littleclown27 (talk) 13:21, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Littleclown27!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Genomes.io (July 24)

S0091 (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- All good - thanks a lot. Littleclown27 (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Florent Chavouet (August 8)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Florent Chavouet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
August 2025
Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 15:21, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hey @Cremastra- thanks for pointing this out. As disclosed before I use ChatGPT as an aid but make sure to triple check before I submit. If you can point out which sections are bothersome I will make sure it prevents any confusion. I don’t mean to cause havoc. Just to be as effective as I can. Thanks! 2A02:C7C:9A9E:E800:D85C:E4E0:5C1A:F5BF (talk) 15:24, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for divulging. AI causes more trouble than it's worth (because you have to triple check, as you do), and is pretty strongly discouraged here. I'd strongly encourage you to just not use it in the first place. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 15:25, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks - will do! It has helped me to get into things and I need it less and less. I was also made to understand that even though it is not encouraged it is not in violation of any Wikipedia policy. Not sure which edits have been reverted now but I can assure you I have been working on all of this for the biggest part of the day. Littleclown27 (talk) 15:30, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for divulging. AI causes more trouble than it's worth (because you have to triple check, as you do), and is pretty strongly discouraged here. I'd strongly encourage you to just not use it in the first place. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 15:25, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Genomes.io (July 24)

- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Genomes.io and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Littleclown27!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 14:00, 24 July 2025 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Mafia has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 21:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Florent Chavouet has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Concern regarding Draft:Genomes.io
Hello, Littleclown27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Genomes.io, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Florent Chavouet 1
Hello, Littleclown27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Florent Chavouet 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Genomes.io

Hello, Littleclown27. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Genomes.io".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
