User talk:MariaY-MHG

Hello MariaY-MHG. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Sukhdev Toor, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MariaY-MHG. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MariaY-MHG|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jay8g [V•T•E] 00:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the note. Please could you guide me through how to declare conflict of interest? I am a little love in the template coding. Thank you. MariaY-MHG (talk) 18:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I2Overcome was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

References are improperly formatted and may be AI-generated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukhdev Toor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I₂Overcome ^talk 00:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi I2Overcome. Thank you for the comment. The References are generated with the automatic 'add a citation' function that was built in within the article. Please could you kindly specify which reference is wrong and the formatting method.

I also want to note that the article was written in my own language. With some verbiage cited directly from the article, which those articles were cited in the reference section. Please could you provide me with more specific comments and guidance to how I can improve the article?

Thank you. MariaY-MHG (talk) 14:13, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grapesurgeon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Also a bunch of errors; look in the reference section

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukhdev Toor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

grapesurgeon (talk) 02:41, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi grapesurgeon. Thank you for the comment. The References are generated with the automatic 'add a citation' function that was built in within the article. Please could you kindly specify which reference is wrong and the formatting method.

I also want to note that the article was written in my own language. With some verbiage cited directly from the article, which those articles were cited in the reference section. Please could you provide me with more specific comments and guidance to how I can improve the article?

Thank you. MariaY-MHG (talk) 14:13, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, the references have error messages written on them in red that tell you how to fix them grapesurgeon (talk) 14:32, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I have fixed all the errors marked in red in the reference section. MariaY-MHG (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Btw, do you work for Toor? Were you asked to create this article by Toor or anyone who works for him? You must disclose this on your user page grapesurgeon (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I understand that I have to disclose the article with this code - {{paid|user=MariaY-MHG|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} I have just entered and pasted this code on my main user page. Please could you let me know if this is done correctly? Thank you. MariaY-MHG (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I fixed it for you, thank you for disclosing that grapesurgeon (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much. May I know if my latest submission is fine, are we able to get this approved soon? MariaY-MHG (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm personally unsure; could you try asking for a reviewer at the WP:Teahouse? grapesurgeon (talk) 15:50, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I just did. I also ran it with AI detector and it says "We are highly confident this text is entirely human". I hope it gets approved soon. Thanks again. MariaY-MHG (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)