User talk:Mickomicks

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Typhoon Rai while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. FourNoddlers (talk) 04:17, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Noted with thanks Mickomicks (talk) 05:12, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Considering you are the only one who seems obsessed with the Typhoon Rai intro, I have to ask, was this edit you? You saying "noted" above sounds like an acknowledgment. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:14, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

i did not make that edit, i just recently made edits to Typhoon Rai without noticing i was logged out on my iPad. And i am not risking of being banned just for editing while logged out Mickomicks (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

This edit - did you do it? Are you this user? If so, you can't be claiming to be a different user, especially in talk pages. You have been warned repeatedly not to revert articles and to engage in discussion, but we can't have a productive discussion if you are writing both as Mickomicks and as the temporary number account. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Not this edit, i rarely touch my talk page Mickomicks (talk) 01:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in weather events. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:02, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I would like to add Consensus for following the usual lead of this article (Typhoon Rai) Mickomicks (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Which is “Typhoon Rai, known in the Philippines as Super Typhoon Odette. That part, so can i please have consensus for this lead. Every other article used this lead. Mickomicks (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Mickomicks, don't ask for consensus for the lead on your talk page. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:07, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

OK Mickomicks, you asked for me to reach out to your talk page. As I've said elsewhere, having a shorter intro to an article, such as Yagi, Rai, or Koto, is preferable to saying the Philippines twice, especially if the Philippines were the main area affected. Does that make sense? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Why is it a problem to mention the Philippines twice? Mickomicks (talk) 00:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

It's redundant and bad writing. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:02, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

If you dont want to mention the Philippines twice, then i recommend changing “severely affected the Philippines in mid December 2021” to “severely affected Visayas and Mindanao in mid December 2021”. We are mentioning the Philippines, but just not in a way of saying its name Mickomicks (talk) 14:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Not everyone knows where the Visayas and Mindanao are, and it won't be obvious that those islands are in the Philippines. Is there a reason you are so insistent on the wording "known in the Philippines as..."? That is the problem I am trying to fix, because that wording created some issues, but you seem like you'll oppose any other wording. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

“Severely affected the central and southern portions of the country” Mickomicks (talk) 10:03, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been warned on multiple times not to engage in edit warring, but you are still continuing the same pattern of behavior on the Typhoon Rai article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

You should have blocked them from Mainspace so they can discuss on the talk page FourNoddlers (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

I have done that. Mickomicks, you are blocked for 72 hours from editing articles, but you can still talk on talk pages. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

I am quitting Wikipedia Mickomicks (talk) 07:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Do whatever you want, I DONT CARE Mickomicks (talk) 07:18, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

I am tired of all these, ever since i joined the leads have been changing, and now i am quitting FOREVER Mickomicks (talk) 07:18, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink, i have had enough of this and i am quitting Wikipedia. It was too late to even block me. Its just that i can’t handle the rules and i cant be myself Mickomicks (talk) 13:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

If i leave Wikipedia, then i am free to learn Tropical Cyclones on my own pace Mickomicks (talk) 13:14, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Especially correct things better Mickomicks (talk) 13:21, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

And i will join Reddit Mickomicks (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Mickomicks I wish you luck in whatever you end up doing, just try being openminded and work with others, rather than insisting on doing things your own way. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink- And for the Wikipedia Owner and Administrator team (this is my absolute last comment). I would say you should allow people to be freer in every place, the reason i am departing Wikipedia is because the “Rules” are more like “Restrictions” to me, where i can’t be myself. Compared to Reddit, i can ask questions, express my feelings in places i like, and even have better conversations with the Reddit Community. While on Wikipedia, the so called “Rules” cant let me be myself, the conversations i get to are not calm and i feel like its “Badly” intensifying. Mickomicks (talk) 12:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

And thanks to that, i am mentally struggling (like 70% mentally struggling from the “Rules”) Mickomicks (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Mickomicks, if you want if you are mad from Wikipedia, you can join the Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki, you can make your own fictional hurricanes Mastercane F X (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mastercane F X, i will try your suggestion, and maybe we can follow each other there Mickomicks (talk) 21:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

I have bad news Mickomicks - there are rules almost anywhere you go, whether it's online or in real life. You're allowed to ask questions here, you're just not allowed to engage in edit wars. Competency is required on this website, so if you can't follow the rules, yea, you are going to have a bad time. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Im talking about Personal questions @Hurricanehink, like expressing your own feelings. Reddit and Possibly Hyphothetical Hurricanes Wiki encourages me to express my feelings. While Wikipedia doesnt. So my suggestion is you should allow people to be freer in Wikipedia Mickomicks (talk) 21:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't a place meant to express feelings though, it's to write an encyclopedia. And an encyclopedia should not be based on feelings, but the objective truth. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Honestly, a true encyclopedia has atleast mercy to users, it doesnt have too much “Rules” and basically its how a normal website would work (better Mutual Respect). I expected Wikipedia to atleast have good mutual respect, but look what i have got into. I have absolutely no offense but my nickname for this “encyclopedia” is “Absolute Encyclopedia but from Hell” Mickomicks (talk) 10:23, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

And if the encyclopedia “assumes good faith”, can you explain why there are too much rules in this “Wikipedia” Mickomicks (talk) 10:26, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Ili only return if the administration team and owners team will remove some rules that has caused me trouble, because i believe that less rules is less effective, and more rules might contain more pressure, and more balanced rules make the encyclopedia fair (not too much rules), which i don’t think you will ever do. So that means i might never return. Mickomicks (talk) 10:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

But i am still free to chat with anyone Mickomicks (talk) 10:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Untill the end of January Mickomicks (talk) 10:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink, read the messages after what you recently sent Mickomicks (talk) 10:31, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink An actual encyclopedia is a trusted, easy-to-read source of knowledge, designed for learning and understanding — not for enforcing complicated rules on the reader or contributor. Mickomicks (talk) 11:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

And a real encyclopedia shouldn’t pressure the user with rules

It should allow curiosity, exploration, and learning without making the reader feel restricted, overwhelmed, or stressed Mickomicks (talk) 11:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Mercy? You've been given several chances. First off, you're allowed and encouraged to explore the encyclopedia as much as you want. However, the rules are enforced for editors (not readers) to make sure the website stays reliable. Second off, you've had plenty of chances to explain yourself in discussion, but instead you had to have things your own way. You were very disruptive with all of the typhoon articles, even though I kept telling you that there were other articles and tasks that needed work. Your edits did not add or improve the articles you worked on. If you're not improving things, then you are not being a productive editor. One last page you should read - WP:CIR. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink, and im done, shut up Mickomicks (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

And plus, all? When it only happened to 4 or 5 Mickomicks (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

I am never returning Mickomicks (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Can you point me to a contribution that you were proud of, that did not involve the lead of an article? If you had at least one, then maybe I was wrong. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink, I really suggest you disengage from the discussion and ignore them. Mickomicks stated many times that they are no longer interested in editing, so convincing them to come back will only waste time.

@Mickomicks, if you're quitting, stop replying and log out. You're not benefiting from anything by chatting with Hurricanehink. FourNoddlers (talk) 23:54, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Check List of Philippine typhoons, i refined the mentioned typhoons to their respective ID’s [e.g. Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) -> Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda)], the community allows the edit. Mickomicks (talk) 07:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@FourNoddlers, it is my choice to stay in my own account even when i am retired.

@Hurricanehink, i have an edit on List of Philippine typhoons that is not from the lead. Mickomicks (talk) 09:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mickomicks! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! GiftedIceCream 14:28, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

btw, you can add anything you want in your sandbox. GiftedIceCream 14:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

@GiftedIceCream this is Mickomicks in a different phone, i may be leaving Wikipedia, it is on my UP (User page)

CONSIDERING RETIREMENT

PHOdette2021 (talk) 10:03, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop moving the Mactan–Mandaue Bridge article without first reaching a clear consensus on the article's talk page. Your changes have been reverted multiple times by at least two editors (including myself). Please read the instructions at WP:MOVEWAR and WP:RM and familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's practices. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@BarrelProof- why use Mactan-Mandaue Bridge if there is another Mactan-Mandaue Bridge, any official or widely used name (except Mactan-Mandaue Bridge) would distinguish it from the newer Marcelo Fernan Bridge. I have stated it multiple times MbloxTide (Mickomicks Phone Account) (talk) 14:31, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I do not currently have an opinion about what the title should be. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:38, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Maybe Sergio Osmeña Bridge or Sergio Osmeña Jr. Bridge MbloxTide (Mickomicks Phone Account) (talk) 21:49, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm FourNoddlers. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Typhoon Yagi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FourNoddlers (talk) 00:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Noted, also i decided to stay so yes im back in WikiProject: Tropical cyclones. And also is Tropical Storm Nokaen (Ada) notable enough for a standalone article? Mickomicks (talk) 01:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2024 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. GiftedIceCream 14:54, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. GiftedIceCream 14:44, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

What did i do? I stayed silent for days already and you send this now?

i did not mean no harm Mickomicks (talk) 23:47, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

See below thread. GiftedIceCream 20:19, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

it was necessary because i just wanted to revert an edit in Typhoon Haiyan article involving a lead, and he chats me like "you always focus on leads" when i made edits in List of Philippine typhoons that did not involve a lead. Mickomicks (talk) 02:37, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

and i mentioned it clearly on his talk page 1 month ago Mickomicks (talk) 02:39, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

hi Mastercane F X (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

hi :) Mickomicks (talk) 11:35, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

he chats me like "you always focus on leads" when? Also, some of the edits to List of Philippine typhoons were reverted. GiftedIceCream 19:43, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Please reply to the above thread. GiftedIceCream 15:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at SM City Cebu. GiftedIceCream 19:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@Mickomicks I am worried, I wouldn't like it if you are blocked again. Mastercane F X (talk) 13:29, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Its actually interesting that your worried about me, but actually im doing well and i am trying to protect the Typhoon Rai article once again (but i know its not mine). Tommorow, i have my final exams as a student in DBTC-Cebu Mickomicks (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Good luck! I have added a source to your edit to DBTC-Cebu. GiftedIceCream 15:42, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Mickomicks, to check in, are you comfortable revealing where you go to school? GiftedIceCream 20:57, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes Mickomicks (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

And you can always call me MFQ cuz thats my initials Mickomicks (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Its talk pages… Mickomicks (talk) 01:18, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

...which are not forums or chatrooms. Stay on topic. This amount of chatting unrelated to Wikipedia is not appropriate. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:48, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Im never discouraged despite all the warnings i have received since my entry in November 19, 2025 Mickomicks (talk) 05:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

hi 🌀 Mastercane F X 🌀 🌀 Talk Page! 🌀 15:36, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Mickomicks (talk) 12:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

How to get a style Mickomicks (talk) 12:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

As I've said many times, please focus on things in articles other than the opening sentence. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:46, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Are you gonna lecture me more than needed?, I know Mickomicks (talk) 21:51, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink if you want to lecture me, do another topic of lecturing. For this kind of lecture, can you please shut up. Mickomicks (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

+ i just reverted it and im okay to get it reverted Mickomicks (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions despite all of the warnings I gave you. GiftedIceCream 15:43, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar! Also GIC i have a question: are you an admin (you dont have to answer if you dont want to, i respect decisions when it comes to personality) Mickomicks (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. GiftedIceCream 14:29, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

You actually look good as an admin! Mickomicks (talk) 11:35, 27 February 2026 (UTC)