User talk:Mr-ck

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mr-ck/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Mr-ck! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Thanks for you quick review and your comments. I did several adjustments on the text. I would be very grateful if you could evaluate the revised version and let me know which parts may need further adjustments. Best. Mr-ck (talk) 14:27, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Q ENERGY Solutions. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your specifications. I removed all sources that are directly related to the company and added instead external sources. Mr-ck (talk) 16:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, again. I did some substancial adjustments on the text and double-checked all sources, to make sure everything was published by professional media editors. I would be very grateful if you could evaluate the revised version once again. Best, Mr-ck (talk) 15:56, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Mr-ck. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mr-ck. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mr-ck|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 11:21, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your message and for pointing this out.

I apologize for not being aware of the paid editing disclosure requirements. You are correct that I am employed by Q ENERGY.

I have already added the required disclosure to my user page and will refrain from further direct editing. Going forward, I will follow the recommended process and propose any potential content through appropriate channels.

Thank you for your guidance.

Mr-ck (talk) 13:11, 10 June 2026 (UTC)