User talk:Nail123Real

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to China–Russia border, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 18:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

i won't do it again

- Nail <3 Nail123Real (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to Jesus, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 19:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

same thing as the china-russia border, i said i won't do it again, but i accidentally did it, because i forgot, i really promise this won't happen again, anytime soon. Nail123Real (talk) 19:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Happened half an hour later. Please read MOS:OVERLINK. Belbury (talk) 20:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

dang it Nail123Real (talk) 20:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page 2025 Kartalkaya hotel fire has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. "rip turkey" doesn't have anything to do with the contents of your edit here (the actual edit itself is completely fine) Grumpylawnchair [ALT] (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

i was just saying "rest in peace turkey" because the situation was sad Nail123Real (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Please provide more describtive edit summaries (as in, make the edit summaries describe your edit) in the future. You aren't in trouble. Grumpylawnchair [ALT] (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

okay, i would make it more verbose, soon Nail123Real (talk) 18:38, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I just wanted to note that it would probably be best if you didn't refer to spelling mistakes as 'vomit'. I'd guess that most people on this wiki don't speak English natively, so you should be nice to those who don't have great knowledge of the language; that comes with the added benefit of a lower chance of getting into conflict with other users. Of course, you did well fixing the mistakes (they should be fixed), but this is a volunteering project and nobody really appreciates their efforts being snarked at. :) WP:Etiquette has useful tips for keeping the atmosphere nice around here. ☀ Hijérovīt | ^þⰁ_č 11:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

oh, so my list of languages are inaccurate, and thanks for saying that i fixed a part of wikipedia, Thanks - Nail123Real (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to United Nations Security Council Resolution 2123. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Nail123Real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United Nations Security Council Resolution 2123, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

okay, i'll just submit for review, and if it gets deleted, then whatever, its so short, its not even good Nail123Real (talk) 20:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians interested in Molossia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:39, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

i am not even interested in this, just delete this right away, molossia is kind of cool but not THAT cool Nail123Real (talk) 10:50, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Free guy64 (talk) 23:09, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello Nail123Real! The thread you created at the Teahouse, ChatGPT usage, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

ok Nail123Real (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcgaylor was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a bare-bones draft, which needs more context and information before it is ready to be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United Nations Security Council Resolution 2123 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jcgaylor (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

eh Nail123Real (talk) 18:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Nail123Real! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jcgaylor (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)