User talk:NanoNerd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, International institute for nanotechnology, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thank you so much for this info. This is my first article submission and clearly did not do enough research about conflict of interest! So embarrassing. I definitely don't want this to be rejected so I'll get on those corrections, starting with requesting a name change and clearly stating my COI. It's such a common practice in the nonprofits I've been with that I honestly never considered the username to be a potential red flag, but reading this totally makes sense. Is it possible to withdraw the submission and send it back to my sandbox? Or is that not necessary.
I'll get started on switching my name or create a personal account with my COI and start a draft. I actually made a draft of this article first but was having so many problems I had to start all over in sandbox. Thanks again for being so helpful. International institute for nanotechnology (talk) 21:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
The draft has already been submitted, so someone will look at it in due time. I have a concern about the figures - if they have been adapted from the linked articles published in ACS Nano, et cetera, they very likely are copyrighted and should not be used on Wikipedia under a free-use license as they are now. -- Reconrabbit 13:50, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
I think you're right. Permission from the authors doesn't mean permission from the publication itself. I am double-checking with the publications. Good note! International institute for nanotechnology (talk) 17:57, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Structural Nanomedicine (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shocksingularity was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Shocksingularity (talk) 03:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, NanoNerd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shocksingularity (talk) 03:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Structural nanomedicine (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WeirdNAnnoyed were:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:COATRACK. Only the first reference really defines the term "structural nanomedicine"; the rest of the article is a list of cherry-picked examples segmented to look like an article. The "principles and design" section should be the bulk of the article, as this is where the term can be fully defined and developed, but it's three incredibly vague platitudinal sentences cited to two primary articles on RNA therapeutics. The article is obviously LLM output, to boot. The subject is notable (if a little buzzwordy), but this article needs a total rewrite to cover it properly.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:58, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI