User talk:CNMall41

Happy First Edit Anniversary CNMall41 🎉

Hey @CNMall41. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 12 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 15:30, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Vikram Vedha

Please add {{better source}} besides all the sources you deem unreliable. Since Ssven2, who took the article to GA is largely inactive, I'll look into it. Kailash29792 (talk) 20:40, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

@Kailash29792:, pretty much all the Twitter references would be a good start. I only spot checked the others. I can do the cleanup later today and then ping you for anything else you see sufficient. Looks like the GA was from 2018 so these were likely just FANCRUFT that built up since then. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

@Kailash29792:, have a look. I was correct about FANCRUFT and some of the wording should be changed but removed the tag. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:27, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Avaada Group

Hello CNMall41 Please tell me how may i do best for the edits on Avaada Group, I would love to understand the process.

First thing I would suggest is reading through WP:COI and WP:PAID and making the appropriate disclosure. Once that is done you can request the edits on the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay thank you I will read the COI guideline. ~2026-15597-2 (talk) 09:11, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Crowdfunding platforms of Hong Kong

A tag has been placed on Category:Crowdfunding platforms of Hong Kong indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Help

You helped me with Nate Martin and I need help again for Incredible Health. It was denied twice, once with my edits and I need suggestions on getting it approved. MattWrites37 (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Third opinion request

Hi, just a heads-up that I’ve requested a third opinion at Wikipedia:Third opinion regarding the Channel stats wording on Talk:Nick Shirley#Channel stats. No action needed from you at this point. This is just to get a third-party look. ◦ Sibshops (talk) 19:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Actually, I am not sure you understand the ONUS process but if you filed then okay. I don't see an issue with the wording you left at 3O. While you are here, I want you to know that I am trying to AGF, but the constant goal post shifting is starting to appear like WP:POINT.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing

Hello, and thank you for reviewing the draft.

I understand from the decline that the current references do not demonstrate notability because they are not sufficiently in-depth, secondary, and independent of the subject, and that routine announcements are not adequate for this purpose.

Before continuing further work on the draft, I would appreciate some guidance to ensure I am proceeding correctly. Specifically, could you please clarify what types of sources would be considered in-depth enough for this subject? For example, would a long-form business profile, investigative feature, or editorial analysis in a major newspaper (such as The Hindu, Indian Express, Mint, or Business Standard) meet the requirement if the company is the primary focus?

Thank you for your time and for any direction you can provide.

— ~~~~ Captain sparrow199 (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Now at AfD where notability can be discussed. It doesn't look good that you just now disclosed PAID even after being warned about it last year. It also doesn't look good that you went around page protection to post direct to the mainspace despite two recent declines of the draft you created. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Top AfC Editor

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor
		In 2025 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:56, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Hi CNMall41! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Nick Shirley. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Nick Shirley, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. EEpic (talk) 23:08, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Uh, I am very aware. Maybe you are not aware of contentious topics which you just violated the 1RR for. Will template you now since you are new here. By the way, see WP:DTR. Also, templating in retaliation because of your bludgeoning will not be something that goes over well with the community here. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

ABS-CBN shows on All TV programming list

Why is batang quiapo and what lies beneath removed even though it's showing on all tv. I also see roja on the list but not the other two. It should be there they're both abs produced shows. ~2026-56336-8 (talk) 09:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Because they are not original programming. In fact, Roja should be removed as well since it is simulcast and an original program of Kapamilya Channel, not All TV. List of All TV original programming could probably be redirected and merged into the main page since most of those programs are not All TV originals. --CNMall41 (talk) 09:40, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Churnalism

If I had a penny every time you use the word Churnalism, I'd be rich :P

But I see your point. Lack of proper journalistic standards in Indian sources is very frustrating. It wasn't always this way though. I recall reading good articles in Indian language newspapers and magazines before the digital era. Now they just dump poorly researched articles on the internet. While the good ones are rare to find, everything is labelled under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. -- Ab207 (talk) 19:38, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for conceding the sourcing falls under NEWSORGINDIA. There is still good Indian sourcing with journalistic standards and they are night and day from the sourcing used to promote these film pages. They are in fact, churnalism, used to get clicks to site. I think you are also eluding to ONLY publications listed under NEWSORGINDIA should be considered unreliable under that guideline. That is a common fallacy I hear in AfD discussions. The guideline states "examples of" and then provides some to consider. That list is not all-inclusive. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

List of schools in Zimbabwe

There is currently a discussion at Talk:List of schools in Zimbabwe#Keep the blue links only. You can join the discussion if you like. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:56, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

A question.

Hey it's bothering me that on a lot of website pages, there's a URL for the website and then under "External links" it has the same URL. It seems redundant. Are both really necessary? Bluey449 (talk) 07:15, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

I am not sure about necessary. There is a lot of things on Wikipedia that may not be necessary but they are part of the manual of style such as external links and WP:INFOBOXES. Generally it is allowed to have the official website in an information box and external link. If you look at companies and biographies you will see it as standard. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:18, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Is it preferred to have both, or just one in the information box, or just one in the external link? Bluey449 (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

I think preference would be subjective. I will say that it is pretty standard so removing a bunch all at once is not a good idea. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:46, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Regarding a COI investigation

Hi @CNMall41! I'm reaching out regarding a COI investigation that you made, involving the page contributor for Faheem Abdullah. As discussed earlier on the subject's Talk page, the article page is met with repeated promotional vandalism by multiple users with the same pattern. All of those follow a similar MO of deliberate attempts to promote the subject.

You may want to look at the most recent instance, which I've reverted as of now. Does that remotely imply that there's similar activity coming from a chain of connected contributors? Retro music11 (talk) 15:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

I believe you mean SPI, not COI. I am sure there is COI activity but the focus is more on the use of multiple accounts. This was previously filed in connection to the tag so you could start there if you believe they are related. If you are able to connect them based on editing behavior (something more than just editing the same page), then you could file a new SPI case. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:49, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

I meant COI activity coming from the previous contributor AdityaJagdhane07.

Another contributor User:ITF01, was later renamed to User:Renamed user 8e93d50df1c6c15cf15f679954e50ba0, soon after you suspected them using AI on Talk:Faheem Abdullah. That account currently remains blocked globally. Following which, they've been using temporary accounts to promote puffery. All those users are furnishing the same motive. I'm not sure of how effective an SPI would be in the case of temporary users. As in the previous case, I was able to see that one of them turned dormant.

Yesterday, a similar COI activity was performed by a newly registered user. Literally an uncredited autobiography. I've reverted it for now, but I'm sure such activity is bound to happen on a recurrent basis. Retro music11 (talk) 22:08, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

I am not a CU, but from experience I believe they would support a check if you have a few SPAs restoring the same content, especially if it the same content that was introduced by a now blocked account. If you think you have enough you can file and if they don't feel you have enough they will just decline the CU. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

@CNMall41 You were absolutely correct! That was indeed a sock. Retro music11 (talk) 16:25, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Great job!--CNMall41 (talk) 22:29, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 February 3 § Category:Companies of the United States by location

Please Check, I have already given strong source/References

Hello CNMall41,

Thank you for taking the time to review the article and for your feedback.

I would like to clarify that the article Drishyam 3 (2026 film)* has been supported with multiple strong and reliable secondary sources, including The Hindu, The Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Economic Times, India Today, and Bollywood Hungama. These are well-established publications that generally meet Wikipedia’s reliability standards.

Similar sourcing patterns have already been accepted for articles such as:

• Ramayana Part 1 (2026 film)
• Dhamaal 4
• Battle of Galwan (2026 film)

Because of this, I respectfully believe the article satisfies WP:NFF and WP:GNG, and does not rely on trivial or routine coverage.

I request a careful re-review of the sources before keeping the page in draft space, as the article was developed with significant time and effort (around two hours) using notable, independent references.

If specific issues remain (such as formatting, tone, or particular citations), I would be happy to address them promptly.

Thank you for your consideration. James4135 (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

@James4135:, first, please read WP:PAID and provide the appropriate disclosure. Then, please list all accounts (previous and current) you have on Wikipedia. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Insight on lede section

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section#Lede_and_infobox_that_is_chock_full_of_list_of_names You might have something to say there.. Graywalls (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes I do. Thank you. I am not fully versed on how search optimization would work with lead sections of Wikipedia but I am familiar with the term "front loading" as it relates to business writing so makes sense. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Front loading in search optimization sense is to load things up for the purpose of influencing AI generative search result and Google searches which is heavily towards the lede section. Graywalls (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

I tried to go down the rabbit hole online but got confused when reading about is AI influence. I do see it is an attempt to get "above the fold" in Google which is a way of manipulation which is not something we want to allow here.--CNMall41 (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Speedy deletion nomination of The 50

A tag has been placed on The 50 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ravensfire (talk) 21:24, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Yeah - I know you aren't the creator, but with the move to draft, the script thinks you are. They copy-pasted it back and this is an easy G4. Hope they work on the draft. Ravensfire (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

It will wind up on one of the pages I have watchlisted (The 50 (TV Series), or The 50 (Television series), etc.). This one has been bludgeoned to death. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) My gut instinct is that a term like "The 50" should have a disambiguation solution, perhaps redirecting to the disambiguation page 50. BD2412 T 18:00, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

I was thinking that. Looks like it's protected now which is even better. These film socks will bludgeon under different names which will show they are circumventing AfD and attempting to avoid SPI detection. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Like clockwork. See The 50 India. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:37, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

And just to keep record of the thread for future creations, today there was The 50 (Reality show).--CNMall41 (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Keen Website Logo.png

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deluxe Marketing logo.png

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:16, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Ask for clarification.

Hello. I saw that you nominated the page for deletion under WP:CFORK. Could you please explain what specific content overlaps with the discography page? If needed, I am willing to improve or restructure the article. Thank you. I am David Fincher (talk) 09:07, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

If you look at the pages you can see which content overlaps. It is an unnecessary CFORK which is why it was redirected. You removed the redirect without any explanation so it was taken to AfD. Any discussion surrounding its notability can be done there. --CNMall41 (talk) 09:14, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Teegarden's Star b (talk) 10:55, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

February 2026

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Afusic, you may be blocked from editing. You can not remove the sourced data like this, it is not a matter of debate if it is official or not, the information is clearly verifiable with the source. Zuck28 (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zuck28. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Afusic&diff=prev&oldid=1339523329 Zuck28 (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

@Zuck28:, first, this is not the place to discuss content. Second, WP:DTR. Feel free to open a discussion on the talk page per WP:ONUS, but the content is being objected to so you need to get consensus. I realize it can be stressful seeing a page wind up at a deletion discussion, but remain WP:CIVIL and follow guidelines please. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

This is not a discussion it is a warning for your disruptive behaviour. Zuck28 (talk) 00:16, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

@Zuck28: Don't warn. If you feel my behavior is disruptive, please report it. Adding non-notable chart information in an attempt to prop up a non-notable page isn't acceptable. In fact, please make sure to include your previous refusals to use ONUS (after your block was lifted mind you) when you file the report. No reason for you to come back here. I have stated many times the disruption is exhausting. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi CNMall41. Thank you for your work on Religious Liberty Commission. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a good weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 03:16, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

@SunDawnSunDawn:, not I. Just created the initial redirect is all. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:04, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Man I came to read your talk page. You have a lot of patience. Czarking0 (talk) 07:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@Czarking0:. Thank you. I am 60 but look 80 if that tells you anything. I will also admit it drives me to be bitey at times although I am aware and working on it. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:26, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi CNMall41. Thank you for your work on Dawood Al-Sherian. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start! I recommend addressing different spellings of his name, as there appear to be in the different sources. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Interesting. Not mine but I see from Draft:Dawood Al-Sherian that I moved it from sandbox to draft when submitted. The new creation helps me with something though so thanks for the notification. --CNMall41 (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your expertise required !!!

Hope everything is going well with you.

I’m contacting you after seeing your contributions to AFUSIC to ask you how you determine and find reliable, usable sources for Wikipedia articles. I’ve been having issues with figuring this out, and would greatly appreciate the insight of an editor with your experience to help clarify the matter (My problem as a newbie).

I’m looking at creating an article for Falak Shabir, a Pakistani singer-songwriter. His article has been deleted twice. The only reason I’m considering recreating it is that I think he may be a notable source according to Wikipedia’s guideline (I may be incorrect). Before I invest some time and effort into creating his article again, I’d love your opinion on whether it’s worthwhile to attempt and how I could assess sources correctly so not to have it deleted again.

I realize that you are probably very busy, after looking at your talk page and how many requests you have received. So if you don’t have time to respond, I completely understand.

Thanks again for your time. Jameskida (talk) 18:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

So you say that Afusic is notable, yet you now state you are unsure of how to find reliable sources. Once cannot exist without the other. I am unsure how to assist you. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:40, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

No, I did not mean to imply that Afusic citations are not reliable. I was just trying to understand your method of finding reliable sources so that next time I go to edit a page, I can do it the way you do.

Since I have been on Wikipedia, I have had very little intention with senior editors, but I am doing the best I can to learn on my own, which is why I was hoping for some advice on how you find reliable sources and what your usual procedure is so that I can follow it.

The Afusic references I gathered are from well-known platforms, such as Geo, Daily Times, The National News, etc. Additionally, Afusic and his music are widely recognized in Pakistan. Jameskida (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Mazha Thorum Munpe (TV series)

Hello, CNMall41,

Could you check your edit here? It looks like it is a redirect to itself. You must have intended another target page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

You are correct. Should have been to Asianet (TV channel). Fixed it. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:35, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

"Enforced BRD" for AMPOL?

Hi CNMall41, as a very belated reply to Special:Diff/1333005748, are you sure that "Enforced BRD" was relevant there? It seems to be neither a topic-wide nor a page-specific restriction for the article about Nick Shirley, so I wonder where that idea came from. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:18, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@ToBeFree:, I honestly do not recall. There were so many reverts by this user despite ongoing discussions as well as an RfC that was also open. It was more than me who reverted user. I cannot remember why I used BRD as a term instead of ONUS but it was all related to the user adding their preferred versions of content despite ongoing discussions. This was also after being warned and requested not to. Seems like something that is becoming a habit. I haven't even looked at edits on that page in a while nor the RfC. I will say that if I misused a term or did something that ran afoul of guidelines, let me know as I am always open to hearing how to improve. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

It's all good; yeah, I guess ONUS is the policy section for that situation. And the general advice of better stopping to edit war is also valid. I just stumbled upon the user's talk page from AE. No worries. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Not defending anyone's conduct, but I thought at the time it was just a new user who was charged based on a highly publicized event or set of events which is always common with big news. Commonplace with big news events. They stopped editing for a while so I stopped paying attention. You will be able to see the back and forth in the edit history though. For the ONUS/BRD, I am sure I was charged up seeing the reverts so just cited what I thought best at the time. Likely an emotional edit summary rather than a logical one. I'll make sure to pay closer attention. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Review Request

Hello CNMall41, I want to ask if you can review my article Draft:Eliot K-8 Innovation School. I have fixed the problems from previous denials and I have more citations. Welovecontributorss [talk] 06:04, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I see you left this message for multiple people. I think the best route would be to contact one of the users who originally declined the draft. They were the ones with concern and should be able to give you better feedback. Good luck. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:24, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Another barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your tireless efforts to fix the pages for Peebles Corporation & R. Donahue Peebles! For years, conflicted users like @Kpryles550 has been trying to cheat & corrupt the system, & it is only through independent research like yours that Wikipedia's neutrality is preserved and protected. Thank you for your patience, @CNMall41!

I could see that. Hopefully they will follow proper COI procedures going forward. If not, it can always be brought up at WP:COIN. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:31, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Help with rejection

Hi hope you are doing well. I wanted to follow up on my Wikipedia project to clarify, and I apologize on the separate submission from the original post I'd lost access to the original account when switching computers and couldn't for the life of me remember or recover the login info / email I signed up with. Not sure if there is anything there you could help with that, it would mean a lot. Also on the second half of your comment, I did rewrite everything is there more I should do there? Also not sure if should've done this yet before reaching out, but I resubmitted it to the original post. Thanks ahead for your time on this. Memeification (talk) 08:49, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

@Memeification:, I am assuming from your edit history you are meaning Draft:Meme art. Honestly, it looks like you used AI to create it and i do not believe it is going to be accepted. See WP:LLM as it does not come close to meeting manual of style guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 09:04, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Comeback Again

My son i am back again, i have too much methods, don't worry I want fu*k your sister and mother also you l. Delete this i am back again. Father ~2026-13996-69 (talk) 09:19, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

You have "too much methods?" lol Sounds like you have very much grammar problem. lol

No stalling

You cannot continuously revert at an article like Flock Safety then stall out the talk conversation. You need to actively participate and seek consensus. Your interaction over the last several weeks intentionally or otherwise constitutes reverting other editors then solely putting up counter arguments without proposing anything. You leave others threads hanging with no response for days while you continue to edit other pages then revert. Czarking0 (talk) 03:23, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

I understand your contention but there was no stall. I did not edit Wikipedia for a few days which is likely what you are referring to by "stalling." Also, WP:ONUS is on the person seeking to add the information. That means it is on you to get consensus for inclusion, not I. I have actively engaged in the discussion and stated several times that RfC may be the best route. You then make snarky comments and even state that I shouldn't be editing the page. That is not really constructive so I try to engage with you as little as possible. I have stated my contention as have other editors. See WP:DEADLINE and WP:SATISFY. Again, I would recommend going the RfC route as there is no consensus that I see. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

You are the one making snarky comments. You do not get to say "Sigh" as your edit summary and then start accusing people of being snarky. You have done a great service to WP and I hope you encourage to do on other pages. There is also WP:SILENCE since you seem to love bold text. I am not the only editor that you endlessly oppose without offering any alternative suggestions. Whenever a reasonable compromise is found you stop responding, misunderstand the situation, or ask for a new section to be discussed. Czarking0 (talk) 04:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Also do not go moving the conversation to my talk page. Czarking0 (talk) 04:15, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

First, let me be clear that you are not welcome back on this talk page. I don't tolerate incivillity. As far as content, if there is an issues, use the article talk page as others are doing. If you have an issue with conduct, please take it to ANI. I will do the same. With that in mind, I want to give you one more opportunity to self-revert. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainment companies based in Missouri

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainment companies based in Missouri indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Just a question...

Greetings, just got a quick question as there seems to be an inconsistency between experienced editors on what is allowed and what is not allowed on chart tables in articles. Looking back 2 months ago, kindly refer to [] where you added the Mainstream Rock Airplay chart in the table and cited it in prose, even though it charted on the Rock & Alternative Airplay chart. Does this not go against WP:USCHARTS? Flemza (talk) 14:02, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

There seems to be two separate issues. The first is about experienced editors and what they "allow." Not sure how to address that without having further context. The second is about me adding the wrong chart. You are free to correct it as I do not recall the edit but I am not perfect and may have added the wrong one. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:57, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Story Kitchen

To the reviewer who checked this draft a month ago. I understand that topic is not notable and is already included at the page for Dmitri M. Johnson, but I’ve managed to complete most of the history of the company from it’s former side of dj2 Entertainment to the recent company Story Kitchen. I’ve been cleaning up, formatting the paragraphs, and got almost every project scrapped or in production. With that in mind, I would like for the admins to make another proposal to make the page notable if possible. I’ll understand your decision until further notice, but I’ll keep making sure that Story Kitchen’s history is up to date on recent events so far. ~2026-15909-89 (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

"I understand that topic is not notable and is already included at the page". There is nothing I can do with something that isn't notable.--CNMall41 (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

At least double check the page to see if it’s notable enough. ~2026-15909-89 (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

At least disclose your WP:COI per WP:PAID which is a requirement. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

And, your future edits such as this need to be requested on the talk pages of the articles. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Will this work as a request? There’s been an redirect on the Way Out game as well but I’m more focused on Story Kitchen’s page than that. ~2026-15909-89 (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

See this. I want to assume good faith but the history of the pages and your SPA activity show you have a clear COI and your requests will go no where until you follow the rules. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I’ve followed the introductions carefully and make a COI request on Draft:Story Kitchen. Thanks for the help. ~2026-15909-89 (talk) 20:50, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Not sure how else to assist here. You do not need to request edits to a draft, just articles as stated above. You will need to make a COI disclosure however. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:55, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Alright… it will be hard though. This is a first for me. I don’t understand why we can have another proposal like before. ~2026-15909-89 (talk) 20:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Regarding Draft:Gruhabhanga (TV series)

Hello CNMall41,

I hope you're doing well. I am writing to let you know that I have significantly overhauled the draft for [[Draft:Gruhabhanga (TV series)]] following your recent feedback regarding reliable sources and WP:NEWSORGINDIA.

I have made the following specific improvements:

• High-Quality References: I have removed all YouTube and blog-based citations from the references section. They have been replaced with secondary sources from major national newspapers, specifically The Hindu and The Times of India.
• Internal Connectivity: I have linked the cast and crew to their existing, established Wikipedia biographies (including Girish Kasaravalli, S.L. Bhyrappa, Malavika Avinash, and others) to better demonstrate the article's context within the Kannada media landscape.
• Formatting: I have added a narrative episode summary table and corrected the Infobox parameters to ensure the page meets standard TV series layout guidelines.

I believe the article now meets the core verifiability and notability requirements. Could you please take another look when you have a moment? I would greatly appreciate any further guidance you might have.

Thank you for your time and for helping me improve this article!

Sachudj (talk) 04:25, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

You have not actually. You removed some content but have not addressed the sourcing issue. No amount of editing will help this get approved until first you can show, through significant coverage, that the topic is notable.--CNMall41 (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello CNMall41,

Thank you for the feedback. I understand the concern regarding primary sources, but I would like to clarify that the current draft no longer relies on YouTube for its notability.

I have fundamentally updated the article to include retrospective secondary coverage from national-level outlets that demonstrate the series' enduring cultural impact:

Deccan Herald (2017): A profile detailing how the show launched the career of National Award-winning actor Achyuth Kumar.

The Hindu (2025): A retrospective analysis of the show as the definitive visual adaptation of S. L. Bhyrappa's literature.

Industrial Impact: I have added details regarding the show's departure from soap opera tropes to "cinematic realism," a shift noted by film critics as a turning point in Kannada television history.

The YouTube link is now strictly an "External Link" for reader convenience and is not used to support notability (per WP:GNG). I believe the current version establishes the show's significance through its industrial legacy and the involvement of acclaimed director Girish Kasaravalli.

I would appreciate it if you could take a final look at these specific secondary citations.

Thank you, Sachudj (talk) 04:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

You are responding as if I missed something. You JUST added more sources so do not mislead and make it seem like you had previously done so. Now, the references you just added are about the person who wrote the book that the screenplay was adapted from. This does not show notability for the show. Finally, please do not use AI to make your responses. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:32, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

My apologies for the confusion. You’re right, those sources were for the novel’s legacy, not the TV series itself. I’m sorry for the misleading update.. it was a lapse in judgment on my part while trying to find references. I'll stop making changes for now and focus on finding independent coverage of the 2003 broadcast to meet the notability guidelines. Thanks for the correction. Sachudj (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

I apologise for using ai to frame me response as I am not very much aware of the lingo use for wiki references. I had to rely on someone or some tool to build the response. Sachudj (talk) 16:32, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

it was a lapse in judgment on my part while trying to find references is 100% another AI response. Please see WP:LLM. I understand you may not know some of the terminology for Wikipedia but you can state in your own words. If you follow links to the resources previously provided (it does not appear you have), this will help guide you through what is needed here.--CNMall41 (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate the technical feedback on the sources, but I have to say, the constant accusations/mockery/insulting of using AI are pretty discouraging. I'm a real person trying to contribute to a subject I care about, and being treated like a robot makes the process feel more like a "some unwanted work" than a contribution. I think I’ll step away from Wikipedia for now.

I hope you do not treat others the same way you did with me. Reading into your talk page, I do not have any more good feelings.

Anyway, thanks for the time you invested in reading my article. Sachudj (talk) 05:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

I do treat everyone the same. Sorry you feel like the victim. Your responses were 100% generated by AI so not sure how else to respond at this point. You are welcome to continue editing but if that includes using LLM then I would suggest not doing so. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:39, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

I feel sad about you. Not sure why you lost faith in humans and treat everyone like machines. I never ever want to continue with this. Sachudj (talk) 16:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

When you use a machine to formulate your response, I assume I am talking to a machine. No need to feel sad about me. If you don't want to continue with this, please formulate your own responses instead of machine generated text. I will assist if I can but do not like to have conversations with AI. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:06, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Feedback Support

Hi CNMall41, Thank you for reviewing Draft:Gustafson Porter + Bowman! There are a couple of recommendations you have made that I'd like to tackle one by one.

You've mentioned a majority of the Awards are not notable - I'm a bit lost on what is and isn't considered notable? I could restrict/summarise the list to just wins but I'm assuming that isn't what you meant?

Will review the projects list and promotional text after this (need some time to learn and review what I can do better). Thank you again for your time. User:Justine Beaucourt GP+B (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

The section on awards is a lot of the promotional text. It is something that the firm wants people to know but you need to ask if this is what a reader coming to Wikipedia wants to know. A lot of these "awards" are industry awards that are not necessarily recognizable. A firm is not inherently notable based on awards wither. I would include anything the firm may have won found here but leave the rest out. Some I cannot even find a website for so not sure how significant they are. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Draft Rejection

You rejected my draft. Am I allowed to submit again? How do I upgrade the article for the founder? HCTFotC (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@HCTFotC:, See WP:COIREQUEST.--CNMall41 (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

I made the request in the sandbox. Please help review if done correctly. --HCTFotC (talk) 23:08, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

It was not correct. I left a note on your talk page. Please take the time to read through COIREQUEST as linked above as it explains the proper procedure.--CNMall41 (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I made request at talk page of article. Hopefully this is correct. --HCTFotC (talk) 02:53, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

@HCTFotC:, I will take a look in a bit. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:14, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I don’t know what to do with the denied request. Please help. HCTFotC (talk) 03:17, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

I normally would not review after someone declined but I dropped the ball on this one. I pinged the editor and if they have no objection will implement the changes. Looks like a huge improvement. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

About Draft:Prince (2026 film) 2

	This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Thanks for your comment and for pointing out the issues with churnalism and unreliable sources like social media links. I appreciate the feedback—it helped me improve the draft significantly. I realized the pre-release version relied too heavily on promotional/announcement-style coverage, which didn't meet WP:NFILM standards. The film has now been released (21 March 2026 on Eid-ul-Fitr), so I've focused on adding verifiable post-release details from reliable independent sources (primarily The Daily Star and other Bangladeshi news outlets). To address your points: - Removed or replaced most social media/Facebook links and unreliable sources. - Trimmed excessive references (from 200+ down to more focused, high-quality ones) to avoid REFBOMBING. - Added sections on release disruptions (technical issues, show cancellations in 50+ halls, reported in The Daily Star) and initial audience reactions. - Emphasized independent coverage of the wide release (130+ halls) and early buzz. The plot is now fully summarized (fictional underworld story, no biographical claims without balance), and reception has preliminary content based on available reports. I believe it now demonstrates significant coverage beyond pre-release hype and meets WP:NFILM post-release. Would you kindly take another look and consider approving for mainspace? Happy to make further adjustments. Thanks again!

No thanks. You continue to use LLM despite many warnings. I also do not assist paid editors unless they fully disclose and follow the rules. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Please Suggest about The 50 article

The page The 50 (Hindi TV Series), which you move to draft space Draft:The 50 (Hindi TV Series) was completely updated but why it is move to draft space? You gave some custom reason so please suggest how can I improve it that to place in mainspace. But I think it is completely ready if I compare it with other pages. Thank you Pratik ishra (talk) 04:44, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Once you disclose your WP:COI I would be happy to answer your question about why a page that has been WP:BLUDGEONed to the mainspace was moved back to draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:45, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dictador Rum logo.png

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:56, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

I can't reply on your page

I have done that what you say, disclosed COI about that article then tell me the reasons Pratik ishra (talk) 05:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

You also need to disclose who is paying you (see WP:PAID). Aside from that, your question was already answered in my reply above. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:24, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Nothing the removal.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Piramal Realty article — looking to expand

Hello, I noticed you have contributed to the Piramal Realty Wikipedia article. I work with the company and we are looking to expand the article with additional sourced information — including an infobox, project descriptions, funding details, and leadership section.

We are fully aware of Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest policy and are not looking to edit the article directly ourselves. We would like to either collaborate with you or understand if you would be open to helping expand the article using third-party published sources we can provide.

Please let me know if you'd be interested in discussing further. Thank you. Rahul2847 (talk) 10:11, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

@Rahul2847:, I only did one edit to the page which was the removal of awards. Looking closer I see the page has a long history of WP:UPE and Sockpuppetry. The first thing I would advise you is to read WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure as you have not yet done so. Then, read WP:COIREQUEST for how to make edit requests. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

CoStar Group

Hi CNMall41, thanks for coming on to discuss my request for CoStar Group. I wanted to just bring your attention to my response and I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts. Here is the conversation we started. --Hbensur (talk) 19:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Dhurandhar (film series)

I originally created the article Dhurandhar (film series) in January 2026, but to my surprise today I found that article to be deleted from the mainspace! Then in draft section i found someone copy-pasted material from original article and changed the title. How is this fair? What about the contribution i did ? MNWiki845 (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

@MNWiki845:, The one I draftified was created by user:Abhayraichandard. I do not see another version but if they copied and pasted, especially without attribution you can likely have it merged. I would be cautious though as the topic would not meet WP:FILMSERIES so will likely go AfD if moved back to the mainspace. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

@MNWiki845:, For what it's worth in case you want to weigh in. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:49, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Todyl

Hello, CNMall41. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Todyl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:11, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Ramayana recreated

Hi. It looks like Ramayana: Part 1 (2026 film) has been recreated again in another title. Not sure if it should be taken to AFD or not. BOVINEBOY2008 18:29, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

It was draftified yet again. Creator is well aware this fails WP:NFF as they had another disambiguated Ramayana draftified a few months. Back. Should it be moved again I think AfD would be in order. Unfortunately, the SOCKs and SPAs don't realize they are doing a disservice as it likely won't be created until the film is released if the bludgeoning continues. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:12, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Another one popped up at Pennum Porattum (film). BOVINEBOY2008 10:45, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Here is the same film article again. Ramayana: Part 1 (2026). I'm moving it back to draft space. BOVINEBOY2008 16:49, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I do not know the connection with Pennum but you are free to move to draftspace if you have a valid reason (or AfD or cleanup). Same with Ramayana which I see you already did. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Josie.Valeri/sandbox

Hello, CNMall41. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Josie.Valeri/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Not mine. Pinging @Josie.Valeri:.--CNMall41 (talk) 04:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hania Aamir - Career and Awards section

Hi @CNMall41,

I added details to the Wikipedia page of Hania Aamir, as those details were printed and valid. She was given the title of Star of Pakistan in UK where I added the relevant links from the news sites. Please let me know why did you remove those details? And the name of the girl is Hania - where Aamir is her ancestral/father's name of surname. So if she gets married and change her ancestral name to husband's name, will you again adapt the details in the page by replacing Aamir? Decemberbaby0612 (talk) 19:24, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Hania Aamir - Reversing the updates I made

I understand that you have been an old user of Wikipedia and I am quite new, still learning to make edits and updates and other things about Wikipedia, but I made the updates in the career and award section after finding relevant resources.

You reversed every edit I made, but did you notice that Titli was her first drama on television and I added it in the first paragraph, that you reversed.

Jo bachey hai sang samait lo - this webseries is still not released. I added pending key to it, that you changed.

I added an award for the recognition she got and you even reversed it, though the relevant sources were provided and I believe the sources were quite reliable.

I would like to know the reason why you have undone the changes I made after finding a lot of details, where not every change made by me could have been incorrect, because I provided the relevant resources.

Your response/ explanation will help me understand what kind of details are accepted in Wikipedia Biographies, if the details with the relevant resources is being undone by experienced users like you. I will be waiting for your response on this one, because I am sure I did not make any mistake while adding the details in the Career and Awards section. Decemberbaby0612 (talk) 20:17, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

@Decemberbaby0612:, You already know about reliable sources and many that you used are not. You also added unsourced and promotional material which is undone again. Your editing behavior and the fact a SOCK approved two of your drafts gives the impression that you have used multiple accounts in the past as well. I don't have time to entertain this so stay off my talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Requesting source analysis at an ongoing AFD

Hi @CNMall41, there's an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celina Sharma. Requesting you to kindly cross examine the source analysis that I've put up. To my knowledge, paid websites do not contribute as WP:RS to establish WP:GNG. But, in case there's an error, could you please provide the discussion with an accurate source analysis. Thanks! Retro music11 (talk) 21:36, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

@Retro music11: the only time it would be appropriate to WP:CANVASS is if I had been part of the AfD discussion or somehow involved in a related discussion on that page. Adding appropriate WikiProject tags to the AfD discussion will notify interested editors otherwise. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you @CNMall41. Some part of that article was a WP:SYNTH. The discussion required an unbiased source analysis, essential for neutral judgement. But I get it now, that interested editors will be notified. Retro music11 (talk) 09:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hania Aamir - Reversing the updates I made

Hi Sir/Madam @CNMall41,

I genuinely wanted to understand what can I do better in terms of providing reliable and relevant links, because the links I added were from the news sites of Pakistan and I believed it to be reliable enough. I really wasn't sure what more genuine link could be added to make the edits feel reliable. I wanted to contribute positively to the platform, so that I don't make wrong edits to any biographies or elsewhere and this is why I reached out to you, but your response - "stay away from your talk page as you're not here to entertain me", sounded like I am reaching out to you for my benefit. I am really not interested in talking to experienced people who are biting new accounts/users like this. I won't make any further edits/updates.

And only FYI - I have only one account, I am not using multiple accounts to approve my own draft or for any other reasons/purposes. Anyways, Thanks for your rude response. Not looking forward to interacting with you anymore.

I didn't know how to reply to your response - that you gave me, this is why I am creating another topic just to convey my message. I was looking for guidance, but I understand that not everyone gets a pleasant experience. Decemberbaby0612 (talk) 19:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No need to reply. Not my first time on Wikipedia and your editing behavior indicates you have used multiple accounts. I will file the SPI to get a determination. As far as content you added, the edit summary stated the reason so please use that talk page instead of this one. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I moved the discussion to the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:20, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Alltroo Support and Sources

Hi CNMall41,

I am trying to publish my first article Draft:Alltroo. My soruces dont meet the WP:CORPDEPTH. I have found a bunch of new sources but want to make sure they would work before re-writing and submitting. Let me know if any f these work.

Sources: https://www.mensjournal.com/entertainment/jeremy-renner-hints-that-season-5-of-mayor-of-kingstown-might-not-be-the-end-after-all https://www.ufc.com/news/ufc-launches-gloves-for-good-program-to-raise-funds-and-awareness-for-athlete-charities https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260226822729/en/CORRECTING-and-REPLACING-Childrens-Hospital-Los-Angeles-Launches-11th-Annual-Make-March-Matter-Fundraising-Campaign https://www.fanduel.com/about/news/fanduel-supports-nfl-crucial-catch-to-help-fight-cancer https://www.canalstreetchronicles.com/new-orleans-saints-news/105752/win-a-trip-to-super-bowl-lx-in-san-francisco-from-drew-brees-and-alltroo https://homeaidhawaii.org/articles/ufcs-commitment-maui-recovery https://www.fightful.com/wrestling/charlotte-flair-alltroo-partnering-to-send-one-fan-to-wwe-wrestlemania-42/ https://variety.com/2025/scene/news/pete-davidson-answer-the-call-fundraiser-sign-up-online-1236606908/ Hbronken (talk) 17:47, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainment law firms

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainment law firms indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 23:50, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Privately held companies of the Isle of Man

A tag has been placed on Category:Privately held companies of the Isle of Man indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:20, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Privately held companies of Armenia

A tag has been placed on Category:Privately held companies of Armenia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. AusLondonder (talk) 08:33, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Todyl

Hello, CNMall41. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Todyl".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Reverted Tag

hi, you pointed me that i have close connection with the subject . There is no close connection as i already mention in my user page that i am from bihar and interested to create biography related sportsperson from bihar. So please don’t put this kind of tag and I appreciate your experience. Thanks Yogiin (talk) 18:19, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

The tag was not referring to you. However, I do find it suspicious that you are removing the deletion tag from the page. Please read the warning left by another user.--CNMall41 (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

And a second time you removed it. Please note this and this as well. You are free to opine in the deletion discussion. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

LLMs

Yeah, I figured as much, especially since I sometimes even see redlinked categories I can't believe anybody would even think we would have (like that "First-generation American people" thing), and ones that do exist but not at the name the creator used (and some of these keep coming back over and over and over again, exactly as if an LLM was suggesting them). But obviously, what with the fact that draft creators don't always follow through with the AFC process, and sometimes just move their drafts themselves as soon as they think they're done, it'll just double my workload down the line (since I also deal with the redlinked category report) if I don't rub out redlinks on drafts right away, even if I'm just disabling the bluelinked categories... Bearcat (talk) 02:11, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

COI request for the Project Management Institute

Hello CNMall41! Due to your previous interest in the subject, would you be interested in taking a look at my open COI request over on the PMI Talk page? Thanks! MK at PMI (talk) 19:40, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, MK. I see you just placed the COI template on the request. I am not sure the elimination of the entire section is due. Let me leave to another reviewer for the time being but will revisit in a few weeks if no one else does so. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Do you also feel socking happening on The Meltdown (film)

These are two who I suspect. Yeetfeetgrace and 4hgoat. Do you also suspect and makes strong case for SPI? RangersRus (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Very possible with at least the two rednamed accounts on the actual page. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:26, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

A similar sock pattern like the one you've reported

Hi @CNMall41, there were 2 potential Alakmarsaify socks that engaged in recreating previously deleted pages. Not potential socks, confirmed in the SPI as a matter of fact.

Today, I came across another recreation Ranveer Allahbadia . Now, if the subject here is the same as the subject as inWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranveer Allahbadia and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranveer Allahbadia (2nd nomination) then why's that history not reflecting on Talk:Ranveer Allahbadia. Do you find that to be a recreation with evasion or a strong sock indication? Retro music11 (talk) 19:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Possible sock. You should file at Alakmarsaify. Present your evidence and leave it up to an admin to authorize a CU or not. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:16, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Done! Thanks! Retro music11 (talk) 14:42, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Josie.Valeri/sandbox

Hello, CNMall41. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2026 (UTC)