User talk:Naraht

Template:Greek Letter Organizations Medical has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 episodes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Naraht, are you aware of this previous deletion discussion? I ask due to your recreation of Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 episodes.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:06, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Ponyo Yes. That isn't what these categories are. These categories are specific to the episodes rather than overall to the seasons. *Both* levels existed at that point and once the Season categories were deleted in this CFD and later a *lot* of back and forth over the notability of individual episodes the primary author moved all of the episodes to Draft and the season episode categories were deleted. See Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 5 episodes for information on when the *episode* categories for each season occured and the notifications to me are at User_talk:Naraht/Archive_18, specifically around 21 November, by Liz.

Once enough episodes of each season went through the AFC process for a season, the episode categories were recreated. (Given that they weren't removed by a CFD but rather after being emptied, there is no issue with recreating them) Each of the categories has at least three entries. There are a few left in the overall Category:RuPaul's Drag Race episodes for the seasons that don't have three episodes.Naraht (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I just wanted to double check that you were aware as the recreation popped up in an edit filter. Cheers, -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

I understand. I presume this means that if Category:ABC DEF GHI had been deleted in a CFD then creating Category:ABC DEF GHI JKL would hit the filter?Naraht (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Ponyo Apologies, didn't ping.Naraht (talk) 20:27, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure exactly what specifically tripped the recreation filer in this case. All good though!-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:35, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Adding apostrophes to file names is not helpful.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 10:14, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kappa Pi Kappa, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Greek letter organization disambiguation pages indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:39, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Template:Cite Almanac FS. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:14, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Zackmann08 Template till in development, hoping for Lua help from Help talk:Citation Style 1. Trying to have the script two arguments generated as a strong from the subtemplate, if you have any ideas, let me know (the values will eventually be generated by a large switch statement) (so for example, if 'K' is the argument sent to the subtemplate, it will return something like section_url=https:/www.oneone.com|section_name=AABBCC , but it doesn't appear it will evaluate that as part of the template at that point. Do you have any ideas? If I have to split into twosubtemplates, I will.Naraht (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page AJ Styles, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:10, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page AJ Styles, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:16, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jeff Hardy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Maxwell Jacob Friedman, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Alpha Pi Omega, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Delta Xi Phi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:40, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Beta Sigma Omicron, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

It appears you had reverted my update of the Angle Trisection page. If you are able to refute my solution, which I have called the arclimits method, I would welcome correction. Sandwich the arc of an angle between a straight line and a semicircle, both of which may be divided into thirds easily, and connect those dividing points. I wonder if the line to connect/trisect/divide is exactly circular, and would enjoy comment. But I cannot reason that the trisecting line would inflect in any way; whereas I reason it must depart from the straight line's dividing point perpendicularly Michaelatobias (talk) 14:51, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLutejg3UkGdy74cILOfXuvkkBEEDoVJ30&si=gGCkdsjs4LHac38z Michaelatobias (talk) 14:52, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Michaelatobias That's not what Wikipedia does. We don't comment on privately published proofs. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth.Naraht (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

no comment necessary. If it's right, consider yourself enriched; if it is wrong, enrich us who know not. If you must edit, ask for verification Michaelatobias (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

your removal of an accurate solution is censorship and comment Michaelatobias (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Michaelatobias It isn't what wikipedia is for, if for all the claims to have solved Angle Trisection, the article would be 100 times the length and you have no more right to do this than publishing it as a book and demand that your local library *or* local bookstore put it on their shelves for sale. Censorship (and similar) is that you can't say what you want on the streets, what you are claiming is the right to walk into a business and expressing your opinion. They have every right to tell you to leave.

Wikipedia has rules, those rules govern what can be posted. What you've done doesn't follow them. Feel free to ask on the WP:Help Desk if you feel that my statements don't represent what Wikipedia's rules are.Naraht (talk) 16:22, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

feel free to continue to think that an angle cannot be trisected, or feel free to argue how it may be the closest possible approximation. So close that the compass and ruler do not show an error Michaelatobias (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Template:Cite Sorority HB05 has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:34, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Pi Kappa Sigma chapters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello Naraht,

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

(Perpetrated by me, not you.) Before spending my time doing this, I should have looked to see if there was an article with the same title (but conventionally capitalized). After editing, I did notice that there indeed was, and was about to zap the draft -- but found that you'd beat me to it. There's a moral in that, somewhere. Happy editing! -- Hoary (talk) 00:55, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

... is Special:Diff/1356075077 really necessary? Whitespace is not usually something we care about, especially in templates. I've seen a few of these now, and they seem rather pointless. Primefac (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

I was trying to clean up the usages of dts where I had left a space behind in the template when I had used my editor to add dts to the chapter and it sort of grew from there. I didn't think it was a problem to clean up, but now that you've objected, I can see where it falls into the category of things that don't change what the user sees. Sorry. :(Naraht (talk) 20:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for the explanation. Primefac (talk) 20:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Please be sure to check your AWB edits. Special:Diff/1358346093, Special:Diff/1358346908 & Special:Diff/1358348540 all duplicated the |open_theme= parameter. We all make mistakes with AWB, but these are pretty glaring as the duplicated parameters were right next to eachother showing you did not review the edits at all. The last one also had a misleading edit summary. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Zackmann08 Hmm. I thought that the automatic fixes of depreciated parameters by AWB would clean that up. I'd see that in the past, may have to loop through again. (So it will eliminate if A exists twice, but not when the change duplicates A) I completely agree on the last, I don't know what happened on the last one's edit summary (I had had a consistent title out of AWB, wierd.) Thank you for the catch.Naraht (talk) 04:22, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

As an additional comment, While I initially was doing normal replaces (without regex) I then noticed it was doing narrated to narrator without me including that in my changes. I was actually pulling from the category that had the depreciated parameters and AWB was doing the depreciated paramters itself, so no regex at all (which is unusual for my AWB edits.Naraht (talk) 04:24, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you about this again, but do you know of a possible advanced search that would find articles that contain both the strings "3st", and "4st"? I am asking this as I have came across four separate examples of articles that have abbreviations of numerical adjectives listed as just nst, regardless of what n is, and I wanted to know if there are more out there, although it could also be useful just to have any advanced search that only selects articles that have both of 2 adjustable strings.
I haven't been very active in the past 10 days, so hopefully I will feel the desire to edit again, since I have only done maybe 10% of the master typo list, at most. - BlueEleephant (talk · contribs) 02:51, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

BlueEleephant sorry for not getting back to you. You want anything with the letters 3st or 4st in that order so it will find 93st and 94st? Naraht (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

BlueEleephant. I did the following https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=500&fulltext=1&ns0=1&profile=advanced&search=insource%3A%2F3st%5B%5Ea-z%5D%2Fi+insource%3A%2F4st%5B%5Ea-z%5D%2Fi&title=Special%3ASearch . This eliminates anything like 3stirring. This causes a few groupings of perhaps problematic pages to jump out. One group is Russian Soldiers, who have File:RUS Georgievsky Krest 3st BAR.svg and File:RUS Georgievsky Krest 4st BAR.svg in their list of medals. Since that is from a Russian government source and it is apparently from a Russian source, I'm not sure it is worth applying for a name change on Commons (which would then filter down to the english version. A second group is images for various pieces of Beethoven Symphonies where the 3st (and 5st for example) are in the image names of musical scores. A third group is in URLs to a specific german sports team's website. Not sure what the st means after the date, not sure it is worth it for those. Let me know if you'd like help on either of the groups of images and renaming.Naraht (talk) 18:04, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! I am on vacation right now, so I am not able to edit anything with adequate efficiency, although I should get back on the 21st of June, not sure what time though. - BlueEleephant (talk · contribs) 19:02, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reinhardt University, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delta Phi Epsilon was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Category:Alpha Phi Alpha members has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 16:44, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Category:Alpha Kappa Alpha members has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 16:44, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eureka College, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to fix the URL. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:

• • Day O'Connor Dinner, Eureka College, 4-9-13 "Google". youtube. Retrieved July 21, 2018. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP. The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month. If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month. This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2026 (UTC)