User talk:Neonmen1

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Uttarakhand. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop modifying / removing longstanding sourced content unilaterally. Seek WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page per WP:BRD. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:58, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Uttarakhand. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Stop edit warring and removing longstanding content. We do not put racial information in articles unless relevant to articles on scientific racialism. If necessary discuss and seek WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

As I said, it is longstanding. Discuss and seek WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page, or you'll get reported. I've opened a discussion, use it, instead of edit warring. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Uttarakhand, you may be blocked from editing. -- in the club bumping that 16:49, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Again, stop removing longstanding sourced content like you did in this article. She self-identified her background, do not remove it. Also look for WP:ICTF compliant sources where her mother's background explicitly, if you want to include that information. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Neonmen1 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:52, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 16:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:17, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

• Please review and ensure you understand the "Introduction to contentious topics" information provided above. You cannot edit articles relating to castes and social groups of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal until you are extended confirmed (i.e. your account is 30 days old and has 500+ edits). If you do so, you will be reblocked or topic banned.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:17, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Urvashi Rautela. Do not remove sourced and self-identified sourced content. You are edit warring again. I'll report you, since you haven't mended your ways. Seek WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page if necessary. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia:Contentious topics/South Asia and continued edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:36, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Garhwal division. Timtjtim (talk) 14:32, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Salani dialect have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Salani dialect was changed by Neonmen1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865884 on 2025-12-13T11:30:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:30, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:35, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you haven't learned anything from your previous blocks, but it ends here unitl you can demonstrate that you know how to edit collobratively. Any admin is free to unblock without consulting me. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)