User talk:Nforce 587

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Iqbal Mirchi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:16, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, The 50, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The 50 (India) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:13, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Nforce 587! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:13, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi DoubleGrazing, thank you for the feedback. Regarding the duplicate status, I believe Draft:The 50 (India) is the more 'genuine' and comprehensive version. It contains significantly deeper research, more independent reliable sources, and better citations than the other submission. I would like this version to be the one considered for review. Additionally, I am having a minor technical issue with the infobox image—could you please advise on the correct format for this template Nforce 587 (talk) 07:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2012 County Championship have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2012 County Championship was changed by Nforce 587 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881558 on 2026-02-25T15:39:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:39, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vestrian24Bio was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The 50 (India) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vestrian24Bio 08:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio Dear every reference is thoroughly checked 2 times than only I added them and also before you reviewed @DoubleGrazing also reviewed and there was no such issue Nforce 587 (talk) 04:24, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

The references are not enough to establish significant coverage of the topic. Vestrian24Bio 06:37, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio OK now adding more references and updating article as well Nforce 587 (talk) 07:02, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

It needs to be in-depth non-routine references as well. Vestrian24Bio 07:07, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Since you pinged me: I never said there was "no such issue", I merely said there is already another draft on this same subject in the system. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:23, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I've just reverted some of your edits because the sources did not support the information you added. The links you gave were top-level domains, which do not generally have any relevant information, and I could not find the sources based on the titles you listed. Please be more careful in future. If you are writing with an LLM, you need to stop doing that. Toadspike [Talk] 22:22, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike Can I know dear that which edits you have reverted so that I could get to know what mistake I have done Nforce 587 (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Sure! I thought you would get a notification for each reverted edit, so I didn't specify. It was these two: . Toadspike [Talk] 07:44, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

What were the reasons or mistakes that you reverted Nforce 587 (talk) 07:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Please read my first message here carefully and then have another look at the sources you added. Toadspike [Talk] 07:59, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:The 50 India logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, CNMall41, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Stop with the bludgeoning. This already exists at Draft:The 50.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi CNMall41,

Thank you for the feedback. I apologize for the 'bludgeoning'; I realize now that creating multiple drafts was the wrong way to navigate the process and I’m sorry for the redundancy.

My goal was to address the lack of depth in the existing Draft:The 50. I have gathered in-depth coverage from major, independent publications [Times of India, The Indian Express, India Today] that weren't included in other drafts.

Since you've directed me to the existing draft, Should I stop updating my draft which consist of higher-quality sources and neutral content. I want to ensure the show meets WP:NTV standards properly. Nforce 587 (talk) 06:21, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Royal Challengers Bengaluru, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:07, 25 March 2026 (UTC)