User talk:Nida Con 47

This is Nida Con 47's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nida Con 47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

This is very sad for me that I'm blocked. In Wikipedia many accounts are allowed but not for illegitimate use. I created this account through WP:ACC and logged in with my new password. I also disclosed that this is my new account. I respect the Wikipedia Policies and disclosed it, but sadly I was blocked on the basis of Sockpuppetery. If there was something wrong with my intentions, I would not have revealed this account. I request to reconsider on my block. This is also unfair to me that I'm blocked directly without a Check user. Please take a look at my request 🙏.

Decline reason:

You are User:Sackiii aren't you? If so the block is correct. PhilKnight (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nida Con 47 (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nida Con 47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Dear Administrators, I hope you are doing well. I understand that my account was blocked due to creating a second account after my initial block. However, I want to clarify that I disclosed my second account in good faith, as I was unaware of the proper procedure for requesting a return to Wikipedia. I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding or violation of Wikipedia’s policies. My intention has always been to contribute positively to the platform while adhering to its guidelines. If there is a process I should follow to regain editing privileges, I am fully willing to comply. I kindly request reconsideration of my block. Thanks

Decline reason:

Blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until the block on your original account is lifted, you personally are not permitted to edit Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 12:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nida Con 47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

@Yamla There is no block on my personal account User:Knowrz7747. I just forgot my password and created this account and also disclosed it on the talk page of User:Liz. User:Nida Con 47 and User:Knowrz7747 are my accounts and the original account is User:Knowrz7747. Nida Con 47

Decline reason:

You cannot request unblock on two accounts at the same time. I'm closing this request. -- asilvering (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk) 12:27, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Your attempt to deceive us will count against you. You've already previously admitted Sackiii is one of your accounts. That account is blocked. --Yamla (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

@Yamla ... Nida Con 47 (talk) 13:41, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

@Yamla I admit it and i disclosed it. There are multiple accounts allowed. I Request you to unblock my one account (User:Sackiii or User:Nida Con 47) or recover the password of my original account User:Knowrz7747, which i have forgot. Nida Con 47 (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Can you please stop pinging people unnecessarily, or you will lose the right to edit this page as well.

Knowrz7747 clearly isn't your "original account", since it was registered after Sackiii. And before you say Sackiii is your original account, don't even go there, since that links you to a much bigger set of problems.

Multiple accounts are allowed under certain circumstances, but not the way you're doing it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:56, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing "Knowrz7747" is my original account. User:Sackiii is my second account and this account (User:Nida Con 47) is my third account and i disclosed it on User:Liz talk page. Nida Con 47 (talk) 15:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Apologies, I got my years mixed up.

Once more, please don't ping users with each message. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Sorry about pinging but i request to take a look at my Block. I created this account for good faith and also disclosed it. I did everything as per Wikipedia:Sockpuppets#Alternative accounts. Nida Con 47 (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing Sorry !! Nida Con 47 (talk) 04:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing Can you please see my clarification? Nida Con 47 (talk) 09:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

I have reverted my earlier unblock decline, since I got the chronology of your account creation wrong. This isn't me saying that you should be unblocked, only that your request shouldn't be declined on incorrect basis. Someone else will review your request instead. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Can you please review my unblock request? Nida Con 47 (talk) 00:15, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Please note that disclosing alternate accounts on another user's talk page is inadequate in fully disclosing your accounts as most people will be unaware of the accounts. Instead, you should disclose alternate accounts on your userpage. Further, I'm concerned about the messages from other administrators on Sackiii's talk page. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade I didn't know the proper way of disclosing accounts so i disclosed it on User:Liz talk page. I am again explaining to you that my original account was User:Knowrz7747, which is not blocked and i forgot the password of that account, so i created a second account User:Sackiii which was blocked due to Sockpuppet. I created this (User:Nida Con 47) account and disclosed it but unfairly I'm also blocked being Sockpuppet even if I disclosed it. I request to unblock my any one account or recover the password of my original account. Thank you Nida Con 47 (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry this has been frustrating. If these three accounts were only linked to one another, this would be easier to handle. However, the Sackiii account is connected to other accounts. As such, we need to address concerns relating to that account to unblock this one. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:46, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade@Significa liberdade I have explained everything in the Unblock request of User:Sackiii. Matching of accounts can be behalf on the same IP address as I'm from Pakistan and using the mobile sim card internet of Zong (mobile network), an internet service provider in Pakistan. Maybe the blocked account is also using the same service provider. I edit in good faith and User:Knowrz7747 is my original account which is not blocked, as you can see the matching of my account username "Knowrz7747" and "Nida Con 47". After the blocking of "User:Nida Con 47", i didn't create any more accounts and just published an unblock request, in hope that i will be unblocked. I request you to unblock my this (User:Nida Con 47]] account. Nida Con 47 (talk) 06:55, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade Can you please reply ? Nida Con 47 (talk) 10:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

This is incredibly rude. Don't do that again. In fact, stop pinging people altogether. --Yamla (talk) 11:28, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

I do not feel comfortable unblocking given the concerns raised at User talk:Sackiii that specifically deal with behavioural traits rather than technical evidence. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade You are good at your place but did you find anything unfair or wrong in my edits. Also i disclosed my accounts but also the result was blocking of accounts. My request to unblock one of my accounts "Sackiii" or "Nida Con 47". Nida Con 47 (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade My explaination :

My account (Nida Con 47) was created through Wikipedia: Request an account process. This was my alternative account after i forgot the password of my original account "Knowrz7747". I disclosed this account on the Talk Page of Administrator "Liz". But unfortunately I blocked for being Sockpuppet because I did not know the proper way of disclosing alternative accounts. My IP address was matching other accounts because I'm from Pakistan and using the mobile data internet through a sim card. I'm from Pakistan and using "Zong CMPak", a mobile network service provider in Pakistan. IP address maybe matches with other accounts because maybe other accounts are also from Pakistan and using the same network provider. I don't think that my request should be declined on these allegations. I edited Wikipedia in good faith and disclosed it. I did not create more account to edit Wikipedia and just published this unblock request in hope that i will be unblocked. If there is anything wrong with my behavior, i will create a new account and edit or not disclose this account. I believe in good faith and respect Wikipedia Policies, but as a result I'm blocked. I clearly say that i have no connections with other accounts and this account belongs to my original account "Knowroz7747", which is not blocked. I request you to unblock my account or recover the password of my original account. Nida Con 47 (talk) 19:57, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. asilvering (talk) 22:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles