User talk:Noears6

Hello, Noears6, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Category:Arthropoda described in 1862, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:24, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Arthropoda described in 1862 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:24, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, I've reverted your article back to a redirect from the species to the genus, and changed the taxobox back to a species box. The genus and species are handled in a single article. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:25, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on MMutotylaspis tripudium† requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hqb (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I just wanted to give a little more elaboration on my Aulacocerida revert. Mindat is a direct information site for minerals and mineral deposits, but is a wiki-style website and needs to be cited with caution. Its not actually a direct information site for fossils though, its simply an aggregator of data from other sources, usually Paleobiology Database. Its a good practice to use the original source and not mindat in such cases as to provide clearer data visibility. PBDB will also give its original sourcing which if possible is the best option to cite if applicable. Best regards in your editing. --Kevmin § 00:22, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello Noears6,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daihuoides for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 10:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)