User talk:Odun Wire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Odun Wire! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Odun Wire/sandbox

Warning icon

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Odun Wire/sandbox has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:46, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing:, you might want to check the new autobiographical draft he created. --bonadea contributions talk 16:17, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
@Odun Wire, please, give it a rest now. I don't want to block you, but I will if I have to. You shouldn't be writing about yourself at all, and if (as it seems) you're not notable enough and insist on attempting to create these autobiographies over and over, that will only end one way. Please find a different platform to tell the world about yourself. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
can you help me out? i have over 10 articles talking about me Odun Wire (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Given what I've just told you, I'm obviously not going to help you carry on in the same vein. If you are genuinely notable (and the sources cited in your draft don't suggest you are, however many of those you have), someone may one day write an article about you, but that should not be you or anyone connected to you. (And if you're now approached by someone offering to do this for money, whatever you do don't pay them anything; see WP:SCAM.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Can I get your contact? Because I don’t know much about this Odun Wire (talk) 16:58, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Can you check my new editing I’m not publishing it just want you to take a look Odun Wire (talk) 16:59, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Please don't go around asking people for their "contact": you've been trying to get this piece about yourself published since September last year, long enough to know how to get into contact with Wikipedia people on Wikipedia (and long enough to learn what Wikipedia is). Here: User:DoubleGrazing, how's it going? That's how you do it.
I had a look at your draft and Bonadea is correct: the sourcing is not up to par. If an article in the Nigerian Guardian says things like "Odunwire's path to prominence has been defined by skill, consistency and a deep connection with his audience", then what we have is not a reason to assume notability but rather a reason to discredit the Nigerian Guardian. The page from the Nigerian Pilot reads like you wrote it yourself. More than half of that Punch article consists of claims that you made to them that they reprinted, about having millions of followers and gaining international exposure; the only thing it maybe actually reports is that you hosted a live stream event. And that Business Day article, that's maybe the worst of em all. The more I look at those sources, the more I am inclined to propose a block per WP:NOTHERE. Drmies (talk) 17:08, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
ok thank you ill just stop Odun Wire (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 09:41, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Odun Wire/sandbox

Warning icon

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Odun Wire/sandbox has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:45, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odunwire (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by A412 was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
~ A412 talk! 21:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odunwire (March 12)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Bonadea, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Odunwire to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

bonadea contributions talk 16:13, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI