User talk:Paracel63

/BEGINNING OF SANDBOX, from talk page on List of conspiracy theories/
(-> To do: use WP:RS and/or use sources talking about issues as conspiracies/conspiracy theories)

——————Proposed subsection to the "War" section——————

Hi. When you recently edited Japan, Our Homeland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited History of Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NTC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Bravo to you for correcting the release date of "how not to dress"!!--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 00:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for coming back to me. I just synchronized the info in the article, lacking time to search for references. Now I've found a good reference. So it's back to 1920. And on the Swedish Film Database, there are more info on early Garbo which doesn't quite match the current film listing in the article. Much of it is readable (through the English version) even for an Anglophone, I guess. So there is more to be done. :-)--Paracel63 (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Fascinating! Isn't it amazing how we spend our time--digging out little details like this on a quest for accuracy. One little problem. In your first edit you write, "In late 1920, a director of film commercials for the store began casting Garbo in roles advertising women's clothing (), where she appeared during the following year." This is grammatically incorrect. Can you rewrite it? I'd do the tweak but I don't quite understand the sentence. Take care,--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Btw, I see that you work on serious issues in international affairs (Libya, Pacific islands). What on earth brings you to the Garbo p. where you're researching the Swed. Film Database for obscure details about her very early, early work in commercials (she was 15 and 16 yrs old)?! You must be Swedish? In any case, you sound even weirder than I am :) --Classicfilmbuff (talk) 16:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Now I reworked the undulating sentence into two sentences. Is it clearer now?

Excellent!

About my profile and activities on Wikipedia, they are part of me and my interests. About the Libyan issue, this was a clear case of an interesting, international current events development, where I could make a difference. This was part of a general upheaval in a part of the world not far from me. And being part of the enwp "newsdesk" on Libya, where I was sure the change was for the better, I got involved in both getting the latest news and spreading them for all to see. This strengthened my belief that Wikipedia can be a wonderful tool for spreading news.

Your philosophy is very persuasive. I never thought of it that way.

I'm Swedish, working mainly on svwp (where I've done close to 20,000 edits there so far),

20,000 edits? Holy Jeeze. (How do you translate that in Sweedish?) Then you're contributing a lot to this sorry world.

I'm a man curious of many things, which makes Wikipedia a wonderful place to be. If you're interested in finding out more, please click through my personal website. That presentation and the short presentation on my user page here on enwp says something about me as an individual.

I look forward to visiting your website.

BTW, I recently learnt that the husband of my aunt Helga was (I think) "second cousin once removed" to Greta Garbo. How about that? :-)--Paracel63 (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Hope you don't have her mental illness (which I allude to in the article) but do have her stunning good looks, talent, and unparalled magnetism!

Went to the SFB but can't find a version in English. So if you remain interested, would be wonderful if you corrected the early work. See you later, --Classicfilmbuff (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

"Holy Jeeze!" in Swedish would be "Jösses!" or "Göta Petter!" A mean value of <15 edits a day in four years time makes for around 20,000. I'm not as good looking as she was, but quite sane. And we're only related through marriage (not through blood, as I know of yet). No version in English? There's a link to the right of the page that sends to . Searching for the name Greta Garbo sends to . I hope you will find this useful. :-)--Paracel63 (talk) 19:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

I like Josses. How do you pronounce it in English? I will introduce it into the American vernacular. Your last edit is an excellent addition! I'll get to the English version, where you identify it. I'll be interested to see your future edits to the filmography or whatever. Take care,--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 22:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, went to the page, but no English versions. I looked at the Awards and of course saw that she won multiple awards in Sweden over a very long period of time. She must have won dozens of awards internationally. I wish there were some way I could compile them. I'll explore. If you have any good ideas, let me know. I'd love to get this in her legacy. By the way, what drew you to the Garbo p. to begin with? Are you a fan?--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 22:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

"Jösses": see Wikipedia:IPA for Swedish and Norwegian for info. Garbo: Go beyond the lacking plot summaries and excerpt the rest of the database info if useful. Use Google Translate where needed. Fan? No. Please visit my website for info on my scope of interests. Now I'll let classic filmbuffs make editions to the Greta Garbo article, while I'll pursue other fields of interest for a while. ;-) BTW, your user page looks a bit empty – why not add something? :-) Best of wishes.--Paracel63 (talk) 01:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 20:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks (twice). 95 percent of my edits are on svwp, but nevertheless. All the best.--Paracel63 (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Midhat Ajanović, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Croatian, Bosnian and Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks I'll fix the links. Best of wishes.--Paracel63 (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arab Winter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arab Winter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

I've been looking into it, but it doesn't seem reasonably possible without a lot of false positives. The problem is that MediaWiki's template syntax is pretty complex as it is; matching the brackets is hard even on correct code, and on incorrect code, there are too many ways to get it slightly wrong. Something like {{template|{{{arg|{{template|value}}}}}} is wrong, but it's almost impossible for a computer to figure out how it's wrong (and without looking at the names, a human would probably be hard-pressed to work out how to correct it).

Something I've been considering is just highlighting any braces that, according to the parse, aren't template syntax, but that runs into problems with <nowiki> (brackets there aren't meant to be matched). It might nonetheless be helpful, I guess? --ais523 19:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for getting back to me! Yes, I understand the problem. The mix of different coding techniques and nested bracketing in Wikipedia articles and templates is far from perfect/transparent. Without the "Show preview" button there would be a lot more editing mistakes. But your code is quite useful as is, and I'm very grateful for you making it. Best of wishes.--Paracel63 (talk) 19:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the catch and correction on Cochise; my attention was on the Mexican period.Parkwells (talk) 15:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome. :-)--Paracel63 (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Would you please think back to this edit, as to why you changed the date in the caption? Because if you look at the information about the photograph you'll see it was taken in 2010, and uploaded 2010-08-04. The photo file was retouched in 2011. If your change was because of the caption on the other picture, well that is wrong too. Compare with the picture seen at Jane_Birkin#Personal_life - same shirt! I'll be hassling whoever made the mistake on the other picture also.

The point of all this is this - if you don't actually *know* the truth or falsity of something, don't just assume something. Damaging articles is bad news. (stomps off in a huff) Shenme (talk) 16:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for the info. Now I've corrected this, which lead me in the wrong direction in the first place. And many thanks for being helpful and understanding in your hassling… --Paracel63 (talk) 18:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)