User talk:Piqro24
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Piqro24's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophie (Sopio) Kiladze (January 23)
Possibly notable, but the page reads like a promotional piece with poorly structured sections.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sophie (Sopio) Kiladze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Piqro24!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cinder painter (talk) 11:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophie (Sopio) Kiladze (May 25)
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sophie (Sopio) Kiladze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophie Kiladze (November 4)
It could be argued that the subject is notable, but the article is poorly structured
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sophie Kiladze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- This is really very unfortunate and I feel myself discriminated!!!
- If you write that it is poorly structured, you need to tell, what exactly is poorly structured. What you did not like in.
- I want to contribute other articles as well but I really have finally lost any desire to contribute to Wikipedia at all.
- This treatment and arbitrariness is not acceptabele at all! There are so many articles absolutely not structured and you are telling me this is poorly structured, but not telling how exactly?
- With all my respect, you are not treating people here equally and this is very pitty
- I stop to publish anything here Piqro24 (talk) 09:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophie Kiladze (December 5)
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
The comment the reviewer left was:
You need to do a major rewrite. At present this is a resume, a list of things that she have done. Please focus on those that matter, and remove minor details. For instance, that she speaks many languages is not encyclopedic information, neither is that she has given lectures. I have marked some of the sections that I suggest that you remove and of little relevance. You may want yo ask for help at WP:Women in red.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sophie Kiladze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.