User talk:Poydoo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
A barnstar for you!
A7
Hi, just as a note, it can be good to wait at least an hour before tagging an article for A7, newer editors often start by creating very short articles just to see if it works and then they add sources and content, like in the case of Alexander MacFarlane (judge). Anyways, see you around :) – Thjarkur (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
"Only $1.00" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Only $1.00. Since you had some involvement with the Only $1.00 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
You've reverted "Death Of A Nation"
There's no reason to delete this film from the list !!!SAaphIrEblUE (talk) 16:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- I replied to this at Talk:List of films considered the worst. Poydoo can talk and edit 16:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
CSD A1
Hi - you recently tagged an article (now at Draft:Jennings Mill Country Club) for speedy deletion as an A1. Please check the criteria for A1 - it needs to have insufficient content to allow you to identify the subject. I was very easily able to identify the subject by sticking the title of the article into Google - that's not A1. A7 would probably have been appropriate, since there was no indication of significance, but you tagged it only five minutes after the author had created the page. Please give authors a bit more time to work on an article before tagging it for deletion. I've draftified it for now in case the author wants to resume work on it. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 15:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oh - I just noticed that Þjarkur said much the same thing back in February - yeah, that applies to A1 as well as A7. Basically if it's not defamation, blatant vandalism or a COPYVIO, give them a bit of time to work on it. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 15:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Why
why remove the NHL 11 fact from Darude Sandstorm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolanisntfunny (talk • contribs) 01:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't. I just fixed the wikilink. @Synthwave.94: removed it, so you might want to talk to them about it. Poydoo can talk and edit 01:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Mason (surname)
Links to DAB pages must go through the (disambiguation) qualifier per WP:INTDAB. When you cleaned up Mason (surname) (this edit), you removed 20 of them and User:DPL bot promptly slapped a {{dablinks}} maintenance tag on the page. Could you put them back, please? It's a bit unfair to expect the next passing DABfixer to do so, and reverting would undo your good work on the page. Narky Blert (talk) 06:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
