User talk:Rforzoni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rforzoni! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2006–07 West Ham United F.C. season have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please don't add content about yourself to articles. Tacyarg (talk) 00:29, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aydoh8 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Autobiographies are not accepted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 11:22, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:04, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aydoh8 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 12:59, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Rforzoni/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Rforzoni/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Roberto Forzoni?

Hello, are you Roberto Forzoni or associated with them? I see that you have submitted an article for creation on Roberto Forzoni and I wanted to check if you were the subject of the article submitting it about yourself. Edittttor (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberto Forzoni (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 06:54, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberto Forzoni (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LuniZunie were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
LuniZunie(talk) 23:56, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Roberto Forzoni moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Roberto Forzoni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it was published by a likely sockpuppet. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:01, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know - How can i improve teh page so it meets Wikipedia standards please/ Rforzoni (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Roberto Forzoni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roberto Forzoni. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:31, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Roberto Forzoni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roberto Forzoni. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Roberto Forzoni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roberto Forzoni. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Information icon Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the draft. I want to clarify that while I used assistance for initial structuring, the draft has been fully rewritten manually and checked line-by-line to ensure accuracy, neutrality, and compliance with all BLP, RS, and GNG requirements.
All references are independent, reliable, secondary sources including The Guardian, The Scotsman, The Independent, The Argus, KM Media, The Standard, The Psychologist (BPS), and international reporting. These provide significant coverage over many years, establishing notability under WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE.
No content from AI was posted directly into the article without human verification. I respectfully request a content-based review under WP:GNG. If any specific lines or sections require adjustment, I’m very happy to revise them.
Thank you. Rforzoni (talk) 15:05, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Roberto Forzoni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roberto Forzoni. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:44, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:46, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Addressing previous rejection concerns – Roberto Forzoni article

I am resubmitting this article having carefully reviewed all previous rejection feedback. I want to address each concern directly.

On notability and independent secondary sources: Previous drafts were rightly questioned on this point. This version cites multiple independent, editorially-overseen publications that discuss Roberto Forzoni in substantive analytical depth, not as passing mentions. These include: Neil Harman reporting in The Times on Forzoni's courtside role with Andy Murray at the 2007 US Open; Barry Flatman in The Sunday Times on his contribution to Murray's mental preparation that summer; a long-form Observer piece by Tim Adams (January 2008) analysing his approach to confidence and injury recovery; The Scotsman publishing his analysis of Murray's development following the 2012 Wimbledon final and Olympics; an in-depth interview in Betway Insider / SPORTbible on the psychology of choking, drawing extensively on his LTA career; ESPN citing him as Murray's psychologist in analysis of the 2016 Australian Open final; The Guardian quoting him as a specialist on striker psychology in a feature on Fernando Torres; and a full career profile in The Psychologist, published by the British Psychological Society in 2014. I would also draw reviewers' attention to a press release from Carter-Ruck solicitors confirming that The Times paid substantial libel damages to Forzoni and published a full apology after falsely reporting on his departure from the LTA. This is independently verifiable evidence of both his public standing and the significance of his LTA role.

On inline citations: Every challengeable factual claim, every quotation, and every statement about a living person in this draft is followed immediately by a numbered inline citation using ref tags, in compliance with Wikipedia's verifiability policy.

On neutral point of view: The previous draft contained language that was too promotional. This version uses neutral, encyclopaedic language throughout. All claims are attributed to named third-party sources. No superlatives or self-promotional framing are used.

I believe this submission now meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and ask reviewers to consider it on that basis. Rforzoni (talk) 17:07, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Roberto Forzoni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roberto Forzoni. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:18, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI