User talk:Rhvanwinkle

an article that I was happy to discover since I am a sculpture editor and hang around Gutzon Borglum sometimes. That's the good news. The "other news" involves the title of the work. To me (one of the 27 words and phrases that mean " my opinion") the Seated Lincoln is by Augustus Saint-Gaudens, in Chicago. The Smithsonian Archives of American Art refer to the Newark statue simply as "Abraham Lincoln", as does this source ^[1]. So .... any ideas? Which is to ask, why do you feel that this work is titled 'Seated Lincoln"? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 04:37, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I was going by what the National Register of Historic Places calls the sculpture.^{[1] [2]} Rhvanwinkle (talk) 15:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Those quacks? Oh, all right. Also, it might just be my computer, but neither of the links that you posted take me any where. If at some point an article about the Saint-G "Seated Lincoln" happens we'll just add (Borglum) and (Saiunt-Gaudens) to the title name and carry on. Sorry that it took so long to find your note. Carptrash (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

I wonder if you would please take a look at Talk:List of the oldest buildings in New Jersey, as I think the article needs some criteria and your input would be helpful. (Thanks for your work on HC cemeteries and NRHP sites)Djflem (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I've been working on the K&E Complex to bring it up to DYK nom, ha please dont add to this yet, as it may increase the 5x beyond what I can expand upon. Thanks - Theornamentalist (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2010 (UTC) PS, Nightscream and I may be meeting up in UC this weekend, are you interested in coming?

Hey dude, I saw when a new bot for WP:NRHP spat out a list of new articles that could possibly be under the project's scope that you were lighting up the Connecticut NRHP listings. I think this is awesome.. though the articles are a little short and could possibly be expanded using the official NRHP nomination forms for each site available at NRHP Focus (see here). One thing I would suggest is that normally when new articles are created in the project, they are added to the front page to kind of let other people in the project know how we're doing. To add an article to the front page, simply click here and add the article to the top of the list, making sure to follow the instructions given there. This is by no means necessary, but I think a lot of people would like to know that these articles have been created. The bot listing is a relatively new thing, so not many people have it on their watchlists yet, so adding articles to the front page makes them more visible.

Thanks for helping out with the project! --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 08:00, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

You may notice I reverse numbering in List of tallest buildings in Newark for reasons mentioned. Need to find specific heights in order to rank bldigs not mentioned which are not available in references to date. I also created redirect for Home Office Building and included earlier sckyscraper inarticle as this seem most appropriate at this time. I wonder if you wouldn't mind to do the infobx for Four Corners (Newark). Thanks for your help. 84.83.130.160 (talk) 19:50, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Rip. Regarding your move of the above article, I don't know if you were aware but there was an open requested move survey on the article's talk page. It might have been better to have let that run its course but in any event, such discussions should be closed (which I have done) following the move so that the article listing is removed from the requested move process page (done by a bot once the {{Movereq}} template is no longer on the article's talk page). Also, when you move a page there are a number of things that often need fixing, such as double redirects created, the page's sort key and, relevant here, any fair use images need to be updated to list the correct page they are included on, which I have now done for File:FDJC Emblem.png. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed your fine work on all matters New Jersey and I thought I'd ask: is Wildwood,_New_Jersey#Wildwoods_Shore_Resort_Historic_District in the right place? It seems to me that this historic district spans Wildwood proper as well as Wildwood Crest, and I'm wondering if you think it should be split off or moved to The Wildwoods, or whether the latter should be kept as little more than a disambiguation page. Please disregard the question if you wish. Thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

The Wildwoods Shore Resort Historic District is roughly bounded by East Topeka, Atlantic, Andrews and Beach avenues according to the State Historic Preservation Office. This area includes both Wildwood and Wildwood Crest with the vast majority of the district being in Wildwood Crest. The district had a SHPO opinion in 2003 but is not on the New Jersey or the National Registers of Historic Places. I would think that having the main article on The Wildwoods page with links to it from both Wildwood and Wildwood Crest would make the most sense.Rhvanwinkle (talk) 20:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I do see that part of the confusion is that the third paragraph of Wildwood,_New_Jersey states that it is also a commonly used term for The Wildwoods (which it certainly was for me, growing up). So the relationship between these two articles is a bit unclear. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

On second thought, I think it will improve navigation if I change Wildwoods Shore Resort Historic District from a redirect to a main article. It merits one and it will resolve any questions as to where this text should reside. I'll make sure there are links to the article from both Wildwood, New Jersey and The Wildwoods. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

In the piece Pulaski Skyway it there's mention of being listed as national historic site, but doesn appear to be listed on Hudson or Essex. Any ideas?Djflem (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

The Pulaski Skyway is listed as a national historic site as part of the U.S. Route 1 Extension. Reference number 05000880.Route 1 Extension The Route 1 Extension is listed under Essex County.Rhvanwinkle (talk) 01:24, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Campbell-Christie House.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 15:38, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Just curious, what improvements would be necessary for this to get to B-class level? Nyttend (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I've added some comments about Hoboken, New Jersey at Wikipedia:Peer review/Hoboken, New Jersey/archive1. I've finished for today, but I'll go back at some point to have a look at the sources. Hope my suggestions are helpful.--BelovedFreak 15:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

It has come to my eyesight that you have prematurely posted some of my sandboxes on Wikipedia as stubs under the Erie Railroad name. I realize they are somewhat open, but please, next time. Try to contact me when you want to edit my sandbox, but not take them and cite that you created them yourself. It is really a spit in the face that you say you did this work and none of the research. I can almost see the copy and paste you did of my West Arlington sandbox as some are still the same sentences I wrote! If you haven't edited the sandbox, technically you can't just copy and paste my work into its own and say you wrote it. I am all open for collaboration, but I am also against making stubs and violations of copyright considering I was the only person whoever worked on them. If you want to edit my sandboxes, you could have asked, and as a sandbox we could've finished all of them, but now I've got to handle 5 more stubs that I didn't want to have happen. Could you please consider contacting me first and stop blatantly pasting my sandboxes.Mitch32^{(Transportation Historian)} 23:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Rhvanwinkle! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Regarding: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Jersey/Hudson County Task Force#Use of templates for federal, state and county representation, wonder if you have any thoughts 13:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

An article that you have been involved in editing, Krueger Mansion, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Adrlite (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of White Horse Tavern (Douglassville, Pennsylvania), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.whitehorsetavern.us.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:32, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Just a reminder that the WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest

will start on Friday, October 21.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Florence 2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 19:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oxford Furnace.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MELewisFrenchunderway.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:26, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Haring DeWolf House.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Van Riper Mill.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Engine2-GTA4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello and good afternoon (at least it is afternoon where I am). I was looking at the Wikipedian firefighters category and noticed that you are one of the members of the Wikipedia community that lists yourself as being a firefighter. First and foremost let me say thank you for your service. While I myself am not a firefighter, I do work as a photographer with multiple local fire departments. I am honored to have firefighters as some of my closest friends.

I have been taking an active role in the Fire Service WikiProject and am trying to recruit more members to this cause. If this is something you have any interest in, please let me know? You can leave me a message on my talk page. Obviously there is zero obligation. An interest can be anything from helping out with a couple of pages in your local area to helping to overhaul major templates, and anything in between.

Once again, thank you for your service. Hope to hear from you soon. Stay safe! --Zackmann08 (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Clifton Fire Department requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in the 20,000 Challenge, aiming for 20,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:North Stonington seal.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —JJBers 17:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello Rhvanwinkle! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:29, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Rhvanwinkle! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

The article Regina M. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive independent sources for generic boat

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Gerda III
• Florence (dragger)
• Roann (dragger)
• Mystic (schooner)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)