User talk:RonsI

Hello, RonsI, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Thank You for the warm Welcome Sir. RonsI (talk) 09:28, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove references to IMDb and replace them with some other news source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pragyesh Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pragyesh Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Dear AngusWOOF, first of all thank you for the suggestion to the article. I just replaced IMDB links with other news links and also added few citations on trusted websites. Please check and i request you to revert the draft in to article space if you you feel it is OK to be moved.RonsI (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pragyesh Singh. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Dear Robert McClenon Sir, Thanks for your comment on the article of Pragyesh Singh. As you commented This draft still has a combination of unreliable and reliable sources. Can you please help me to remove unreliable sources as i am not very familiar with Wikipedia to understand reliable and unreliable resources. RonsI (talk) 06:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

User:Ronsl - If you are not sufficiently familiar with Wikipedia to know how to distinguish reliable and unreliable sources and do not understand a previous reviewer's comment, then perhaps you are not ready to be trying to create new articles for Wikipedia. I suggest asking for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Robert McClenon, i already dropped my message there on the Teahouse but still i didn't receive any response there. RonsI (talk) 09:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

I just saw my notifications, i received a response on teahouse. Thanks. RonsI (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi RonsI! You created a thread called Draft:Pragyesh Singh at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Muninnbot RonsI (talk) 15:14, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Help improve for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Arina56 (talk) 12:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Arina56, it already seems a good article Maureen Wroblewitz. What you want from me. RonsI (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on G.S.K. Velu, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)