Wikiwand AI

User talk:Ryan-serpapi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: SerpApi (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:42, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ryan-serpapi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:42, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Information icon

Hello Ryan-serpapi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ryan-serpapi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ryan-serpapi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi Bobby, thanks for clarifying, I understand the concern and I will make the disclosure. The user who made the initial submission made a disclosure, and I wasn't aware the same disclosure was required to edit it. Moreover, the process to disclose this wasn't obvious to me while editing.
Besides the need to disclose, is there any specific feedback you can provide on the article itself? Ryan-serpapi (talk) 16:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
I've added the disclosure to my user page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ryan-serpapi
Apologies for my misunderstanding - just to highlight that no deception was intended, I included the name of the company in my user name as an informal declaration of this relationship.
Thanks again for your review and would appreciate any additional feedback you can provide on the page. Ryan-serpapi (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Not a problem, and thank you for making the necessary declaration. Just want to make sure you saw my response on my talk page. Thanks, Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, Ryan-serpapi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:SerpApi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. LuniZunie 16:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SerpApi (June 19)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, CopyleftEverything, left the following feedback:
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.
See WP:SOLUTIONS and WP:NPOV. Rewrite article in neutral & encyclopedic for tone & content.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:SerpApi to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

CopyleftEverything (talk) 08:35, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SerpApi (July 17)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Stuartyeates, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
The company is talked about differently in the sources and the articles. That needs to be fixed.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:SerpApi to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Stuartyeates (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SerpApi (August 17)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, LittlePuppers, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Looking through the sources, most are passing mentions or routine coverage of this company. (And to be honest, they currently show more evidence that "lawsuits against SerpApi" would be a notable article than "SerpApi" at the moment.) Additionally, were any AI tools used in writing this draft?

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:SerpApi to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

LittlePuppers (talk) 22:21, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks