User talk:Saragcg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Saragcg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Timeline of private spaceflight did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  10mmsocket (talk) 10:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of private spaceflight companies have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BlackSky Technology Inc. (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OrangeWaylon was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
OrangeWaylon (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Saragcg! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OrangeWaylon (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BlackSky Technology Inc. (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Company is potentially notable but not as written. The advertorial tone has less to do with the choice of wording and more as to the headings and information therein. It is written like a company website and contains company-speak which also leads me to believe there is a WP:COI regarding its submission (please review WP:PAID and WP:COI and make the appropriate disclosure). Listing government contracts and an entire section on "leadership" are clearly not encyclopedic. Think what someone coming to Wikipedia would want to know about the company, not what the company would want that reader to know.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 03:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI