User talk:Sbtimo

Hello, Sbtimo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Radio sisko fm, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JTtheOG (talk) 09:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Radio sisko fm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 09:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Sahby Mehalla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pridemanty (talk) 12:27, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Radio sisko fm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. harrz ^talk 20:30, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Manifest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Manifest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Habertix (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments.

This article is not autobiographical and was not created as a promotional page. Its purpose is to provide a neutral, encyclopedic description of a French-language digital news website that has an identifiable institutional and bibliographic presence.

The subject is not presented through self-published claims but is supported by records in recognized authority and library databases. The publication is listed in the Bibliothèque nationale de France catalogue, has an assigned ISSN for its online edition, an ISNI identifier, and a WorldCat entry. These elements demonstrate that the title is formally identified and catalogued within international bibliographic systems.

In addition, several independent publications have discussed the development and positioning of the project:

• https://www.prlog.org/13124288-le-manifest-que-cache-vraiment-ce-mdia-franais-dactualit-internationale.html
• https://www.prlog.org/13126351-le-manifest-simpose-comme-un-mdia-indpendant-francophone-tourn-vers-lactualit-mondiale.html
• https://newsbywire.com/le-manifest-de-la-webradio-a-un-media-numerique-engage-nouveau-cap-pour-linformation-francophone/
• https://newsbywire.com/le-manifest-peut-il-trouver-sa-place-parmi-les-medias-francais-dactualite-internationale/
• https://newsbywire.com/le-manifest-un-media-independant-au-coeur-de-lactualite-mondiale/
• https://www.communique-de-presse.com/le-manifest-webradio-media-numerique-engage-nouveau-cap-information-francophone/

These sources describe the history, transition from web radio to a digital news site, and editorial scope.

The article itself is written in a descriptive and academic manner, without promotional language, and limits its content to verifiable, referenced information.

The intention is therefore to document the existence, development and bibliographic identification of a French-language news website, not to advertise it.

I am of course open to improvements regarding structure, sourcing, or wording so that the article fully complies with Wikipedia’s content policies.

In addition to the bibliographic records, the topic is a news website (not a personal project), and therefore falls under WP:NMEDIA. The article is based on verifiable information and can be further improved with additional independent coverage if needed. The existing library and authority control records demonstrate that the publication is formally established and identifiable as a periodical rather than a transient or purely self-published source.

I am willing to continue improving the article in line with Wikipedia’s sourcing and notability guidelines.

Hello, I'm Sarsenet. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Manifest seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 13:37, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

The comment I posted in the AfD discussion reflects my own understanding of the sources and the subject. I will rewrite it in a more concise and direct way based strictly on the references. Sbtimo (talk) 13:44, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Manifest without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:26, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Closed deletion discussions are archived and kept in case the page is recreated in future, or someone just wonders why it was deleted. Please don't edit or delete closed discussions. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:27, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Ce genre de comportement est aussi inutile.

Un site web qui s'abrite derrière le SIREN d'une entreprise fermée n'est pas crédible. Habertix (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC).

Harbertix va te soigner et lâche l'affaire Le Manifest n'a pas besoin de wikipédia, a ce point le sujet ta rendue malade et possédée ~2026-15196-62 (talk) 22:24, 9 March 2026 (UTC)