User talk:ShepGlennon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lillian Rosengarten (May 10)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Minna Sora no Shita, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Lillian Rosengarten to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

--みんな空の下 (トーク) 07:52, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, ShepGlennon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --みんな空の下 (トーク) 07:52, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on May 17

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page May 17, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:55, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on May 17

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page May 17, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:58, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lillian Rosengarten has been accepted

Lillian Rosengarten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca talk to me! 06:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Introduction To Contentious Topics

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

EaglesFan37 (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Hey @ShepGlennon! Your article on Lillian Rosengarten falls under the guidelines of an WP:ECR topic (the Arab-Israeli conflict). Since you have not yet accumulated 500 edits on wikipedia, you are not able to edit in this topic area yet. Per Wikipedia policy, ECR articles created by non-ECR users are to be nominated for speedy deletion, and I have done as such. Once you reach 500 edits, you will be able to resume editing in that particular topic area. I know that this is a frustrating outcome, especially given the effort you've put into the article. I strongly encourage you to continue editing, and you'll reach ECR before you know it. EaglesFan37 (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
I have just removed the tag nominating this article for speedy deletion. This is intended as a one-off exception, because ShepGlennon is a new user and may be unaware of the rule that users with fewer than 500 edits may not edit content relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
@ShepGlennon, please be careful to avoid any further editing in relation to the Arab-Israeli conflict until after you have reached 500 edits, since now that you are aware of the rule further exceptions are unlikely to be made. Dionysodorus (talk) 15:22, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Thank you so much, I was unaware of that policy and I will certainly avoid making edits on this subject until I have reached that benchmark. Do you know if there is a place (like a dashboard) where I can keep track of the number of edits I have made? ShepGlennon (talk) 06:17, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
@ShepGlennon: You can find that at Special:Contributions/ShepGlennon, where your edit count should be displayed just under the title. Dionysodorus (talk) 09:29, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Thank you so much! ShepGlennon (talk) 05:47, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI