User talk:SheppardCJ

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Largely sourced to YouTube or other unreliable sources. References from independent and reliable sources are needed to demonstrate notability per WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Also remove external links from the body of the draft. Either use them as references if required or as external links.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alisa Sargsyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 14:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, SheppardCJ! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 14:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Dear Hitro,

Thank you for your message from Nov.9, 2025 regarding my article submission.

Since then, I have carefully gone through the draft and addressed all the issues that were previously pointed out. I did my best to follow the guidelines and improve the article accordingly. The updated version has now been resubmitted, and I am currently waiting for it to be reviewed.

I am a scholar working on my PhD about women composers, and expanding the representation of women in music on Wikipedia is something I care deeply about. I truly appreciate the time and effort editors devote to reviewing submissions and helping new contributors navigate the process.

Thank you again for your guidance.

Best regards,

SheppardCJ SheppardCJ (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, SheppardCJ, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you are working on your first biography of a women and that it has not yet been accepted. You may well be able to improve the draft on the basis of the guidance in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:05, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Dear Ipigott,

Thank you very much for your kind message and for welcoming me to Women in Red. I am truly grateful for your response and for pointing me to the Ten Simple Rules.

I am a scholar currently working on my PhD focusing on women composers, and I am very passionate about this field of research. I have carefully read through the materials and guidance you mentioned, and they have been very helpful. I am hopeful that, with these improvements, my article will now meet the requirements for acceptance.

Thank you again for your support and encouragement. I greatly appreciate the work you and the Women in Red community are doing.

Best regards,

SheppardCJ SheppardCJ (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2026 (UTC)