User talk:Rich Farmbrough

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note
Email may very occasionally be delayed due to spam filtering.
More information Links ...
Links
Talk Archive Index
Close

Table oddities

More information I, II ...
I II III IV V VI VII VIII
4913
7903
8991
4913
7903
8991

4913
7903
8991

4913

7903
8991

4913

7903 8991

4913 7903 8991

4913

7903

8991

4913

7903

8991

Close

Cheshunt Lock and other notes

More information Extended content ...
Close
  • Tha Si Sunthon Heroines Monument
  • Isaac Wayne For his grandfather...
  • St Mary Magdalene's, Longfield lnk Thomas Plume (Also spellings of Longflield.)
  • Ejidal -> Ejido

2025

  • Seacoal Sea coal
  • PPLAAF
  • Shooting Butts School
  • Cassells Paten Pangram (Connoisseur Magazine vol 57)
  • COMB breach

Things to unarchive

Space discussion.

Yo Ho Ho!

Your edit to Talk:Killing of Renée Good

On February 2nd, you added a hidden comment - 15 <-- please do not reduce this without discussion --> - and also changed the number of posts retained to before auto-archiving. Now the talk page has posts & threads from all through January etc. with no new comments. Since the posting furor has gone down a bit, I would like to change the auto-archiving from 7 days to 14 & the number of 'threads kept' to 5 (instead of 15), but wanted to have your thoughts on the matter first. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

HI, thanks for messaging me. I'm completely happy for you to make the timescale 14 days, but I'd rather not let the number of threads fall as low as 5, maybe 10 would be more appropriate. Established articles tend to have shorter threads, and letting these sit on the talk page for a long time allows editors to see consensus on the most relevant topics, without resulting in excessively long talk pages: effectively the talk page is a FAQ. While it's sometimes advisable to read, or at least look at, archives, in general it's not something we can expect most editors to do most of the time. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 00:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC).
Your explanation makes sense. Will adjust the archiving. Thanks - Shearonink (talk) 01:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Most murders

Hi, I am trying to understand your reasons for creating the article about most murders back on 29 June 2025. None of your edit summaries meaningfully explain your edits, so I have no idea of your reasons for creating this article. Also, many of your edits are marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. One of your edits removed a proposal for speedy deletion, without explaining why you are opposed to the article being deleted. While another reverted a blank and redirect to murder, again without explanation. Based on its current content, most of the existing article content is probably off-topic, and I have added clean-up tags to suggesting better locations for most of this content, but I would welcome you sharing your opinion at Talk:Most murders. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

See talk page for discussions about the content page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 19:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC).

Wikidata weekly summary 722

Tech News: 2026-11

MediaWiki message delivery 18:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

US place names

Rich, what is the MOS entry relating to this change? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:17, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI