User talk:Suntooooth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tech News: 2026-16

MediaWiki message delivery 15:17, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-17

MediaWiki message delivery 14:59, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 April 2026

Noticeboard discussion about recent userbox breakage


Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Request: mass rollback of edits breaking userboxes by Astra.L. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-18

MediaWiki message delivery 18:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Lostboycrow moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lostboycrow. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:45, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand how the current sources don't establish notability. All of the secondary sources are significant coverage from reliable and independent sources and span multiple years (the earliest is 2015, the latest is 2020) - the Daily Bruin source is, as far as I know, the only one that wouldn't go towards establishing notability, since it's a student newspaper. Also, while they're not currently in the article, there's even more sources that show notability here. I'd understand criticism of the article for being short and not comprehensive (this is because I got tired of working on it but felt it had enough to be suitable for mainspace), but I genuinely don't understand saying it doesn't establish notability. Suntooooth, it/he (talk | contribs) 13:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
The sources are all basically interviews or reviews of individual songs. That's not enough to establish notability of a musician. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:47, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
The reliability of Euphoria is also unclear to me. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:48, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
Why do reviews of individual songs not establish notability? /gq Suntooooth, it/he (talk | contribs) 13:54, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
Because GNG requires in depth coverage independent of the person, not a short review accompanying a run-of-the-mill song announcement. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:57, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-19

MediaWiki message delivery 20:42, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI