User talk:SuperWikiaBros
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome SuperWikiaBros!
I'm Media Mender, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
Always cite Independent and Reliable sources for all claims you make when editing. |
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
November 2025
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Gonjiam Namyang Neuropsychiatric Hospital, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 20:11, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gonjiam Namyang Neuropsychiatric Hospital
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gonjiam Namyang Neuropsychiatric Hospital to request its speedy deletion, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 20:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
December 2025 incorrect edits
Hi. I'm losing track of your edits I'm cleaning up, so I need to note them here while you stop editing and review your edit history.
These are obviously illogical and false. For those video game articles, your edits directly contradict the *entire* obvious purpose of the articles as I said in my edit summaries.
I guess you somehow declared the existence of the "low" status of all WikiProjects to be magically wrong, which I guess would mean that all the Wikipedia architecture committees or whatever are just somehow wrong about the world. Anyway, "low" does not mean "nonexistent" or "irrelevant". That's the best I can try to make sense of it, I can't imagine why anybody would think this, and you didn't even state a rationale. So I guess you could go have the architects explain to you why that doesn't make any sense to think, but meanwhile just stop deleting them. I know Wikiprojects got reorganized over time, to be more granular and to move stuff out of United States task forces or whatever, but that's not what you said or did there. Is that what happened here? So that's the best I can make sense of it as it stands.
And finally, all edits must have edit summaries (WP:EDITSUMMARY) like maybe "minor copy editing" if it's inherently noncontroversial or "copy editing" otherwise. Or write WP:OVERLINK or something. If you need help, please post at WP:TEAHOUSE. I appreciate your wikicode skills as a new user, and thank you. — Smuckola(talk) 03:21, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Overlinking
I've been noticing how much articles usually have links that are not necessary. Occasionally, I notice that there are unusual links in context (say if you were reading an article about space and says humans have explored it and puts a link to the human article), or links together (ie in the country balls article it says and I quote "UK forces Poland to clean toilets after [[vandalizing]] [[Wikipedia]], which drives me nuts because both of those don't fit in the main context). Also, locations of photos to be linked (ie this sign in [[Finland]] says there is an icy road ahead in [[Finnish]]). Please, it is not good to have so much links, and we should take into consideration this problem. With Wikipedia's huge size and the even bigger size of the Wikimedia Foundation, we should work together for this predicament. Remember, the WP:OVERLINK page says you should not link everyday words, occupations, units of measurement, dates, disambiguation pages, countries, geographic features, settlements or municipalities, languages, nationalities or ethnic identities, religions. More links is not always better.
+Thanks for reading this, SuperWikiaBros (talk) 22:46, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Overlinking and Examples
Hey—there are several cases of overlinking that need fixing. Wikipedia policy at WP:OVERLINK clearly says to avoid linking common words, places, or unrelated terms.
Examples:
In Super Mario Odyssey, an older version linked “a Tyrannosaurus to trample objects.”
In onomatopoeia: “A window shop sign in Italy proclaims…”
Similar issues appear in weather and free-content linking to France and Khmer.
Templates like 
link to countries unnecessarily.
There are also duplicate links—for example, Countryballs captions like “United Kingdom forces Poland to clean toilets after vandalising Wikipedia.”
Many of these pages are semi-Protected, so editors who notice the overlinking often can’t fix it directly. Please review these and remove unnecessary links where appropriate.
Yes, Wikipedia is a work in progress—but overlinking should still be addressed. SuperWikiaBros (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Many of your changes seem to have gone far into WP:UNDERLINK territory, removing links to contextually-relevant pages. DMacks (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)