User talk:Supporter33

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Post-postmodernism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. freshacconci (✉) 04:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Ghasemi is a prolific scholar in Post-postmodern studies, and he deserves to be there. He has been even more active than the scholars listed on that page. So please do not remove him. Supporter33 (talk) 12:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

You have been reverted by four other editors. There is a discussion on the article talk page outlining why this section is inappropriate. You have been told not to re-add this section and you continue to do so. Please read the discussion on the talk page for the very specific reasons this section is not appropriate. freshacconci (✉) 12:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Everybody like you with no knowledge of post-postmodernism can act as an editor! Stop harrasement! Supporter33 (talk) 12:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

You have created a bio page for yourself with no achievement. I removed it. In case, you continue to delete that scholar, all your pages and editions are affected. Supporter33 (talk) 12:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

We need to improve pages, and not remove contents. Post-postmodernism is a neo-trend that requires a special attention, and any information especially from active scholars help researchers. Thank you for your understanding Supporter33 (talk) 12:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Please see WP:WWIN. Please do not attack other editors and do not edit war. freshacconci (✉) 12:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I go through the link and improve the entry in the coming days. Thank you Supporter33 (talk) 12:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Post-postmodernism, you may be blocked from editing. freshacconci (✉) 21:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I have updated the entry based on Wikipedia regulations. Please let me know what you think:

=== Ghasemi's Hyperhybridism and Heterolinationalism and Cyberculturalism ===

In his 2023 book chapter Paradigms of Cyberculturalism in Post-postmodernity^[1], scholar Mehdi Ghasemi introduces "Cyberculturalism" as a successor to postmodernism, arguing that contemporary society has entered a new artistic, literary, social, media, and economic period. He posits that cyberculture dominates at the intersection of real and virtual spaces, influencing literary and artistic production, publication methods, communication, and economic systems. Ghasemi identifies key paradigms of cyberculturalism, including artificial intelligence, multimediality, social media omnipresence, Twitterature, cybercommerce, and cryptocurrency, which impact art, culture, and economics. In his 2022 paper Post-postmodernism and the Emergence of Heterolinational Literatures^[2], Ghasemi introduces "Heterolinationalism" as another post-postmodernist paradigm. He explores concepts such as post-academia, postnationalism, polyliterature, polyvocalism, plurilingualism, self-publishing, social media, multimediality, transtextuality, and fanfiction as defining features of heterolinational literatures. In his 2020 paper Hyperhybridism: Postmodernism is Old but not Old Fashioned^[3], Ghasemi introduces "Hyperhybridism," which he describes as a post-postmodernist phenomenon coexisting with postmodernism. He characterizes hyperhybridism as multidirectional, recalibrating some of postmodernism's foundational assumptions while synchronously engaging with its predecessor. Supporter33 (talk) 10:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Post-postmodernism. freshacconci (✉) 12:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Freshacconci, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. freshacconci (✉) 12:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Post-postmodernism. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. freshacconci (✉) 12:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I agreed with Freshacconci to have a look at WP:WWIN and update the entry. In fact, based on your statement, all entries on Post-postmodernism page should be removed, simply because they introduce scholars active in this neo-trend. Supporter33 (talk) 10:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I ask you to return the entry that you have deleted, and I apply the regulations to it. We are here to improve pages, and not remove contents. Post-postmodernism is a neo-trend that requires a special attention, and any information especially from active scholars help researchers. Thank you for your understanding Supporter33 (talk) 10:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I have now updated the entry based on Wikipedia regulations. Please let me know what you think:

=== Ghasemi's Hyperhybridism and Heterolinationalism and Cyberculturalism ===

In his 2023 book chapter Paradigms of Cyberculturalism in Post-postmodernity^[1], scholar Mehdi Ghasemi introduces "Cyberculturalism" as a successor to postmodernism, arguing that contemporary society has entered a new artistic, literary, social, media, and economic period. He posits that cyberculture dominates at the intersection of real and virtual spaces, influencing literary and artistic production, publication methods, communication, and economic systems. Ghasemi identifies key paradigms of cyberculturalism, including artificial intelligence, multimediality, social media omnipresence, Twitterature, cybercommerce, and cryptocurrency, which impact art, culture, and economics.

In his 2022 paper Post-postmodernism and the Emergence of Heterolinational Literatures^[2], Ghasemi introduces "Heterolinationalism" as another post-postmodernist paradigm. He explores concepts such as post-academia, postnationalism, polyliterature, polyvocalism, plurilingualism, self-publishing, social media, multimediality, transtextuality, and fanfiction as defining features of heterolinational literatures.

In his 2020 paper Hyperhybridism: Postmodernism is Old but not Old Fashioned^[3], Ghasemi introduces "Hyperhybridism," which he describes as a post-postmodernist phenomenon coexisting with postmodernism. He characterizes hyperhybridism as multidirectional, recalibrating some of postmodernism's foundational assumptions while synchronously engaging with its predecessor. Supporter33 (talk) 10:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Dear Daniel, I submitted a request for Post-postmodernism page protection. In fact, this is a neo-trend, and few scholars have made scholarly contributions to it. It requires a special attention, and this page with more information about the herald scholars and their publications help researcher to see the works done. Thank you for your understanding. Supporter33 (talk) 09:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

It requires a special attention sounds like we need to pay special attention to policies like WP:Reliable sources, and particularly the restrictions against using primary sources. Accordingly, your edit is completely contrary to the guidelines, because there are no independent sources cited, only Ghasemi's own work. —C.Fred (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Based on this observation, we should remove the other three scholars listed on the page, because they have used merely primary sources. Take a look and a proper action for all without bias! Supporter33 (talk) 16:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

This is not a matter for simple administrative action. This is a content issue that requires discussion and reaching consensus. To that end, I have facilitated a discussion on the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)