User talk:Svartner

Just requesting can you reverse your NAC and leave for an admin please? Weighing the discussion according to GNG/NCORP guidelines clearly points towards a consensus to delete. Of the Keep !votes, the first made no mention of our guidelines and mentioned "long term presence" and a suspicion there would be more coverage - neither forming part of the criteria for establishing notability. The next listed two examples portrayed as SIGCOV, part of WP:N, and both sources mentioned were pointed out (by me) to fail NCORP criteria, with the reasons why. There was no response. The test at NCORP-releated AfD is for sourcing, and this AfD has produced no sourcing (or no rebuttals to arguments showing why sources fail the criteria). IMO, this is not a candidate for "no consensus" and (in the absence of anyone counter-arguing that the sources are in fact good) should have been a candidate for deletion. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:11, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

I reopened it as you requested, but I really don't see how there's going to be any consensus there. In any case, it's left to an admin. Svartner (talk) 21:17, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Can you re-open? There was a last minute drive-by, an IP and then a keep that is in dispute. Extended the time would be appropriate however. CNMall41 (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

I it also being discussed as part of two other AfDs where the filmmaker is involved. Both are still open. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:29, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Done. Svartner (talk) 21:19, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Svartner, I hope you’re well. I noticed you recently closed this AFD as Keep; however, there was no policy-based consensus to keep the article. Just two "Week Keeps" and a "Keep" !vote, without any policy-based arguments. According to WP:NOTAVOTE, it should not be kept, so I would like to request that you kindly relist it. Zuck28 (talk) 12:46, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Zuck. Even after relisting, there was no support for deletion, that's why I closed it. In any case, I'm going on a trip and won't be back for two days, so I relisted since I won't be able to do anything afterwards. Svartner (talk) 12:51, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Greetings, you indicated a redirect at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infant Jesus Matriculation Higher Secondary School. I added the name to List of educational institutions in Coimbatore#Private, which I think would be a far better target. If you get the chance, could you review this? -- Otr500 (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I have a question regarding sources presented in a later comment at the AfD, which you possibly may have missed. Your response would be appreciated at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lohia family, thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:58, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Svartner, I note that you made a good faith edit but please do not do a non admin closure, when there are clearly some delete comments in the article. Consensus was fully not established, so please wait for an admin decision on I Don't Love You Anymore: Moving On and Living Your Best Life Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

@Flyingphoenixchips: I reverted your reopning of that AfD. WP:REOPEN makes it clear that except for undisputed vandalism, reopening an XfD can only be done by either the editor who closed it or by an uninvolved admin. If you disagree with the close, please discuss it with the closer, and failing that, you can appeal it at WP:DRV. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 17:18, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Gotcha alright Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I don't usually see a problem with reopening AfDs with some controversy, but in this case Cunard was quite consistent with the sources presented, in addition to most of them supporting the keep. As I've been rather short on time lately and Owen has already gotten involved, I'll leave any decision to him. Otherwise, thank you for the message and good contributions. Svartner (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm happy with Svartner's close, but would not oppose an early (three months?) renomination, if anyone believes the issues have not been adequately resolved. Owen× ☎ 15:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

As explained in my comments, I still feel the sources are not enough as they seem to be regular briefs and promo pieces that Indian newspapers generally run. So I feel we should keep the nomination open for further discussions Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 17:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC)