User talk:THRGuru1115
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi THRGuru1115! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Gabriel Jason Dean, from its old location at User:THRGuru1115/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gabriel Jason Dean
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Gabriel Jason Dean requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. MediaKyle (talk) 03:18, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I was unable to locate the contest this speedy deletion page. It appears the page is now gone. This is an error. I am a work study student who works in the English department at Muhlenberg College and Gabriel Jason Dean is one of my professors. This article is legitimate. I used AI to help with coding the sources, but generated the first draft of the article myself and then edited it with AI. Is this not allowed? I'm merely trying to code it properly and this is my first go at this. Please help! THRGuru1115 (talk) 12:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- I would recommend that you start over and write a new draft without using AI at all, even for spellcheck and formatting. There are plenty of helpful humans around here that will assist with that part. The fact that your draft was speedy deleted under criteria G15 means it contained a number of false references added by the AI you used. MediaKyle (talk) 12:45, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. I will try again. I checked all the sources myself previously though. I will just upload my first original draft and go from there. THRGuru1115 (talk) 12:49, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- I would recommend that you start over and write a new draft without using AI at all, even for spellcheck and formatting. There are plenty of helpful humans around here that will assist with that part. The fact that your draft was speedy deleted under criteria G15 means it contained a number of false references added by the AI you used. MediaKyle (talk) 12:45, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriel Jason Dean (December 28)
As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. In short, "notability" requires reliable sources about the subject, rather than by the subject. Please note that some of the references would appear to be from sources that are NOT considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, press releases, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Spotify, Wikipedia etc). Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a promotional CV or advertorial (see WP:PROMO and WP:EXCESSDETAIL), which Wikipedia is not. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid or being the subject, you must declare that on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please see WP:COI and/or WP:PAID). In instances of a conflict of interest, the review of the page needs to be handled with care, mindful of the higher bar set by pages produced in circumstances of such a conflict. Such pages typically may read too much like a promotional CV or advertorial (see WP:PROMO), which Wikipedia is not; and/or contain prose that is not of a standard appropriate for an encyclopaedia (also see WP:PEACOCK and WP:NPV). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NCREATIVE criteria #3, because XXXXX").
Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page, including the name of the draft page, and I would be happy to reassess. As I said, I do think this draft has potential so please do persevere.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriel Jason Dean and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, THRGuru1115!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 01:28, 28 December 2025 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:Gabriel Jason Dean has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriel Jason Dean (February 23)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriel Jason Dean and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.