User talk:Tashi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia (the English version) as of June 2019.

Archive: 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019

RFC Request

Dear Fellow Wikipedian

I would like to invite you to my RFC request on the page One America News Networks. I am reaching out to you to include your expert opinion and your solution to this problem in the RFC request. Please also invite more editors so that we can have a fair discussion that will improve the page.

Kind Regards

Saad Ahmed2983 (talk) 11:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Icewhiz (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

Icewhiz (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is MOS:ETHNICITY on articles about Polish Jews. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:54, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

I'd recommend you WP:REFACTOR your comment about Jayjg in the light of WP:AGF/WP:NPA. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

You have been blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges in relation to information which has been removed from Wikipedia's public records.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org.

Administrators: Information which has been oversighted was considered when this block was placed. Therefore the Oversight team or the Arbitration Committee must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing oversight blocks without permission from an oversighter risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

-- TonyBallioni (talk) 22:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Suggestion

Click [show] for the suggestion. starship .paint (talk) 01:20, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Here's my opinion on what you can do. I'm not an admin but may be helpful. starship .paint (talk) 00:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

1) Composing your request to be unblocked - Understand what you did and why you have been blocked.

If your block relates to Oversight issues, then it concerns edits or log actions you have made which had to be suppressed. This is an extreme form of deletion used for removing potentially defamatory material, serious copyright violations, and non-public personal information including but not limited to addresses, phone numbers, or identities of pseudonymous or anonymous individuals who have not made their identity public. (link)

2) Give a good reason for your unblock - convince the reviewing administrator that you won't do it again.

3) Stick to the point

Focus on the concerns of the blocking admin and the situation going forward. Show that you understand the blocking administrator's concern and what he/she wants you to do better. Blocks happen because the community has to prevent certain behaviors, and we want you to understand some things matter to us. If you show willingness to appreciate our concerns, discuss the incident in good faith, genuinely learn from mistakes, and show you can keep to the spirit of community policies, often that is all that's needed.

4) Talk about yourself, not others - Do not complain about other people, Do not excuse what you did with what others did.

5) Agree to follow Wikipedia community customs

If you are blocked for something you did wrong, and especially if you are blocked for a long time, you are more likely to be unblocked if you:

Admit to it. All your contributions to Wikipedia are logged. There is no point in denying something that you did do (or that other editors examining the record agree it is very likely that you did), because your edits can and will be checked. Even if they were deleted, all administrators, including the one who will answer your unblock request, can still see it.

Give people a reason to trust you again. Promise, credibly, that you will stop doing whatever got you blocked. Earn back our trust by proposing improvements to articles or proposing firm steps you will take so the issue cannot happen again.

Don't do it again. If you were blocked for an offensive statement or legal threat, do not repeat it in your unblock request. Even if you feel that your conduct did not deserve a block, evidently at least one administrator disagrees with you on that point. Assume that the reviewing administrator will agree with the block, and write your request in a way that cannot give further offense.

Tell us why you are here. Say how you intend to help contribute to the encyclopedia after you are unblocked. See here for some ideas about what you could do.

6) Email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org

Hope this helps. starship .paint (talk) 00:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Tashi has left this project

I contacted Tashi on Polish Wikipedia and this is their response. starship .paint (talk) 01:20, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for the information but two days ago I wrote a letter to Arbitration Committee saying that due to the false accusation of antisemitism (for which I was blocked), I decided not to be active on English Wikipedia anymore. I've tried to explain my mistakes and if you saw the discussion you should notice that I did everything (in my opinion) I should. Best regards Tashi dyskusja 21:47, 31 maj 2019 (CEST) Btw. If you mind adding {{RETIRED}} to my user page on English Wikipedia, I would be obliged. Tashi dyskusja 21:50, 31 maj 2019 (CEST)

Orphaned non-free image File:Totlotek Puchar Polski.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Totlotek Puchar Polski.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Miedź Legnica logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miedź Legnica logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:The Visualz EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Visualz EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Proposed deletion of Księga Tajemnicza. Prolog

The article Księga Tajemnicza. Prolog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for almost 14 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate: the Polish article is sourced to blogs and Discogs. Makes wildly dubious claims.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Suggestion

Related Articles