User talk:Tech Savvy User

Hello, I'm ProClasher97. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zenbook have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 09:04, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 14:28, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Zenbook, you may be blocked from editing. 2A02:C7C:4D0A:A500:805B:CF91:FC12:CCFC (talk) 06:55, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Zenbook. 2A02:C7C:4D0A:A500:805B:CF91:FC12:CCFC (talk) 10:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Tech Savvy User. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jay8g [V•T•E] 08:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on ProArt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Junbeesh (talk) 08:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Tech Savvy User, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tech Savvy User|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:59, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Dear Children Will Listen,

Thanks for your comment and advice. I must clarify that I am not a paid writer, nor do I receive any payment, compensation or rewards from any companies and commercial brands for my edits.

My motivation for creating this topic page is my genuine familiarity and interest in this subject. I have tried many approaches and adjustments, but my draft have been declined every time. The recurring reasons are that the content is suspected of being promotional, and the citations do not comply with Wikipedia's notability and sourcing criteria.

After numerous attempts and errors, I am still confused about how to meet Wikipedia's specific criteria for reliable sourcing and neutral point of view. Could you kindly guide me on specific ways to fix the article content and citations ?

Alternatively, do you suggest that I should abandon creating a new standalone page and instead update the existing page/article directly ?

Thank you again for your patience and advice. I am committed to contributing in the correct and compliant way.

Tech Savvy User Tech Savvy User (talk) 03:14, 24 November 2025 (UTC)