Wikiwand AI

User talk:The Sophocrat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome back!

Welcome back to Wikipedia and thanks for your efforts to clean up vandalism! I highly recommend checking out this guide, Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism. An easy way to warn editors after reverting their edits is to use the tool Twinkle, available in the Gadgets section of your preferences page. Parksfan1955 (talk) 07:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, I will check it out :) The Sophocrat (talk) 07:35, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for fighting vandalism on the English Wikipedia! Nahida 🌷 19:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
I see you are newer to anti-vandalism. If you need help with anything, feel free to ask! Nahida 🌷 19:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Woah, my first barnstar! Thank you :) The Sophocrat (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Here's a cookie :D JamesEMonroe (talk) 23:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
A cookie!! Nice :P. Thank you James. The Sophocrat (talk) 02:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

Hello The Sophocrat. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. –HirowoWiki (📝) 03:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, I use those templates a lot. I just usually don't use them when the IP in question has made a singular unconstructive edit in their history, as I believe such IPs are unlikely to edit again soon and a talk page notice may prompt them to edit more (probably unconstructively in such cases). I might be wrong though, and maybe I should also use them in such cases... Anyhow, thanks for the advice.
P.S. I occasionally leave personalized messages on talk pages when I believe it will be significantly more effective than a template. Just so you know that's intentional. The Sophocrat (talk) 03:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Okay, next time you can place warning templates when reverting vandalism. Thanks! :) –HirowoWiki (📝) 03:58, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi @The Sophocrat, I noticed that you warned a user earlier but forgot to substitute the template. I fixed the error, just a friendly reminder to add "subst:" in the template when warning users. Have a good one!
Cookies!

Stickymatch has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.


To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Stickymatch 05:37, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Oh, thank you. I really should get Twinkle, I have been procrastinating on reading the documentation for some reason... And thank you for the cookies! The Sophocrat (talk) 05:53, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Message

Hello,I'm user 92.20.112.81 I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive.

with regards 92.20.112.81 (talk) 02:32, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

what's up

hey ol' buddy i was gonna reply to you once i finished somthing special but i wanted to say I saw you during patrol lol. (not saying you did anything bad but that I reconized your name in it . https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A92.20.112.81&diff=1290789329&oldid=1290789146. small world JamesEMonroe (talk) 02:35, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

huh looking at his talk page. interesting character JamesEMonroe (talk) 02:49, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello James :). Yeah, it's nice to see users I know while editing. And about the IP (who just left a message on my Talk page), I hope they listen to our advice (; ^_^) –The Sophocrat (talk) 02:59, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
it is indeed. JamesEMonroe (talk) 03:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Stopped by to say hi.

Hey I saw you on the Discord, and I wanted to say hi. Tankishguy (talk) 05:16, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello there! –The Sophocrat (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
I will check in your editing history every once in a while because I think it might be a good learning experience. Tankishguy (talk) 05:31, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Okay, glad I can help with that :). Currently I mostly do recent changes patrolling (basically checking Recent changes with some particular filters to find unconstructive edits, and generally following the advice at Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol#What to do). Occasionally I improve article prose or references and answer questions at the Teahouse. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have. The Sophocrat (talk) 05:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
I don't have enough edits for the cvua So I'll see it Tankishguy (talk) 05:42, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Carter v Canada - edit was censored

I wrote a brief comment about why Carter v Canada was wrongly and poorly decided. It got cut out/ deleted. It looks like Wikipedia does not like criticisms of this judicial decision. This is active censorship. There is so much to criticize this case for - and Wikipedia calls giving that criticism not neutral. The only way to appear neutral is to say nothing negative about the case, that is not neutral, that is supportive. AustralianLawyer4455 (talk) 05:36, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

There seems to be a misunderstanding. We can, and often do, include negative coverage of a subject. However, the text must not be our own opinions but rather the interpretations of reliable sources. I assure you myself and most other editors have nothing to do with that case; we only wish to improve the encyclopedia. If you can find reliable sources that criticize (or cover criticism of) the case, then you are welcome to add them (see this guide on how to cite your sources). Have a nice day :) –The Sophocrat (talk) 20:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your help getting rid of the vandalism on that Call of Duty article. Keep it up! Gommeh 🎮 18:56, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
Thank you Gommeh :). Man I love barnstars. Funny I get one when I'm supposed to be on wikibreak... Sophocrat (talk) 19:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
More information Some automated messages. ...
Close

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Generative AI pornography on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 02:30, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Qualified editors are encouraged to find at least one experienced nominator. Self-nominations are also allowed. Please review instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • September 29 – October 5: Nominations phase (we are here)
  • October 8–12: Discussion phase
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed. However, in practice, few candidates succeed without ~10K edits, some content creation, no recent behavioral issues, and a nominator.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 22:30, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

The discussion phase of the October 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks