User talk:Theo1858

Calibretto 13

I genuinely really appreciate your efforts to add more citations to the Calibretto 13 article. However, I'm sorry to say that almost none of them show notability to me, and many of them aren't considered reliable or aren't independent enough of the subject to be the sole sources for much of the article's information. I want to let you know this in clear terms because I don't want you to be upset and/or angry if the article is deleted. I recommend taking a look at the reliable sources and independent sources pages to help you with figuring out if sources can or should be used as the basis for pages. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 15:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate your demeanor. I am working on securing some more reliable sources. I know that Calibretto was featured in HM magazine's print publication on numerous occasions, but those are in print only and not available online. I've tracked down the publication dates for those articles and am in the process of securing hard copies of the magazine. Theo1858 (talk) 21:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Hannibal

Would you be willing to do some research and add the Lost Boys of Hannibal in the Hannibal, Missouri Article in the History section? SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I would be willing to help out, but it will probably be 4-5 weeks before I can do any serious research, as I need to finish up this semester of grad school and my practicum/internship hours. Theo1858 (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Calibretto 13 (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Relies heavily on primary sources, doesn't really establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Calibretto 13 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBritinator (talk) 01:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Theo1858! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 01:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Related Articles