User talk:TigerBangla

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi TigerBangla! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [VTE] 02:31, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimbere Magazine (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, TigerBangla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Blocked as a Sesame Street Puppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:RustaviOri per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RustaviOri. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 07:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TigerBangla (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

I was blocked as the suspected sockpuppet of User:RustaviOri. I believe that this is unfair and a mistake because I have only a last account, and I have not edited abusively. Please consider lifting the unblock. I understand Wikipedia's policies on sockpuppetry. Thanks.

Decline reason:

The technical evidence here is rather conclusive. Stuff like this doesn't really help your case for an unblock either. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:56, 5 September 2025 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TIGERBANGLA (Talk to me) 07:42, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

I'm just wondering how you can explain this edit where you are editing the sockmaster's User page. It's hard to believe you are not connected when you are editing the other editor's User page. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI