User talk:TippTopp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Always Assume Good Faith

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scott Griffith. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Dear TonyTheTiger: The nomination for deletion has been made in good faith, and your terse explanation for reversing it merely states: "nomination not completed". As the instructions on the template state, "please explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page." If you believe that the subject of the entry meets Wikipedia notability standards, please explain it. If you think that the procedure for nomination for deletion has not been following, please provide a detailed explanation, including pinpointing the exact steps that you think should be followed. In the future, we hope that you will refrain from undoing others' work without proper explanation and documentation. Thank you, and have a pleasant day.TippTopp (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Your edits are clearly not vandalism. Please notice, though, that there are three steps to an Articles for Deletion nomination, and you have only ever completed one. See WP:AFD for instructions. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


References in Go article

You are correct that the first few paragraphs of the Go (game) article had lots of unsupported assertions, that's because it was an introduction - the assertions (well, most of them) are supported later on by lots of references. This is standard wikipedia practice for big, complicated articles like this. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 14:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

The style that has developed over time in Wikipedia is not, as a rule, to put references in the introduction, in order to keep it uncluttered and uncomplicated. The intro should be a quick, easy-to-read overview. It's not absolute, you can find references in intros in some articles, but I think it's a good rule - especially for an article like this, which includes exhaustive detail later on. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 12:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Allan Savory

Reference errors on 11 November

ArbCom elections are now open!

Grammar

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI