User talk:Toddy1

You and ESB5415 said that Forced conversion to Islam in Pakistan would be a better name for the article.

I do not know all closing guidelines, so was the close right? ~2026-35608-04 (talk) 02:00, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Give sources from his own books in Arabic where he states that he follows the qadiri Sufi tariqa. Not from others. If there is dispute about him being a qadiri Sufi, it shouldn’t be added. If your sources are from someone else then it should be mentioned “according to so-and-so ibn taymiyyah was Sufi”. It should not be mentioned as a fact. ~2026-37646-10 (talk) 07:27, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

I noticed that you cautioned both editors involved in edit warring over that article. While one or the other of them may take the matter to ANI, my two cents is that both editors involved need a long enforced break from editing articles involved with the region that appears to be their shared obsession. There seems to be an excess of aggressive gatekeeping. BD2412 T 02:58, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I've noticed that Talk:Elliot, South Africa was moved to Talk:Khowa, South Africa by User:Tikita. So, all the historical discussions have been moved to that talk page which doesn't match the article title at present. Are you able to move what is atTalk:Khowa, South Africa back to the original talk page? Thanks. GeographicAccountant (talk) 17:02, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

@GeographicAccountant: Thanks for alerting me. As a result of your message I have made a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Requests to revert undiscussed moves-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:09, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

hi, you wrote here his/her, english has a cool pronoun (they) that saves 3 characters and has an interesting history as a singular pronoun ~2026-38678-64 (talk) 13:35, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aurangabad district was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

fixed-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Anti-Hindu sentiment. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing.

I have requested dispute resolution for the page to try to contain further editing warringShahinshah121 (talk) 23:20, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I can see from the markup that you copied and pasted that from your own talk page.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:45, 5 August 2026 (UTC)