Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

Selection of high-quality pictures by the community From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.
This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.

Promoting an image

If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

All users may comment. However, only those who have been registered on the English Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.

The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.

If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.

Delisting an image

A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.

For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except for one point: If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.

Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.

  • Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).

Featured content:

Featured picture tools:

Step 1: Evaluate

Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.

Step 2: Create a subpage
For Nominations

To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.


For Delists

To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.

For Delist and replace

To create a subpage for your delist and replace, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.

Step 3: Transclude and link

Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).

How to comment for Candidate Images

  • Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
  • Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
  • You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
  • If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.
Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.
Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

How to comment for Delist Images

  • Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
  • Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
  • Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
  • You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor adjusted correctly?

In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.

Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.

On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate.

Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.
To see recent changes, purge the page cache.
FPCs needing feedback


Current nominations

Metropolitan Cathedral of Athens

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2026 at 03:02:27 (UTC)

Original – The façade of the Metropolitan Cathedral of Athens, Greece
Reason
HQ
Articles in which this image appears
Metropolitan Cathedral of Athens, Church of Greece, Athens and Death and funeral of Constantine II of Greece
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
C messier
  • Support as nominatorArionStar (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Muscat

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2026 at 15:19:29 (UTC)

Original – View of Old Muscat, Muscat, Oman
Reason
HQ
Articles in which this image appears
Muscat
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator
Domenico Convertini
  • Support as nominatorArionStar (talk) 15:19, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Pepsi

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2026 at 12:19:57 (UTC)

Original – Three configurations of Pepsi sold in Canada. Pepsi, introduced in 1893, is a brand of cola produced by PepsiCo. It is currently the second most-valuable brand of cola, following Coca Cola
Reason
High quality image presenting three configurations of Pepsi, allowing for the most encyclopedic presentation. QI on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Pepsi
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Food and drink (because cola) or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle (due to branding)
Creator
  Chris Woodrich (talk)
  • Edges were flush with rulers in photoshop. That being said, I have gone through again, and it seems more flush now.  Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:08, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support I was looking at Xiaomi Redmi tablet, looked pretty much more than on PC. Interesting. OK now. --Petar Milošević (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support. Nice work. I ought to get a bigger softbox. My support is in spite of the fact that PepsiCo is a nasty backstabbing anti-American company... JayCubby 20:23, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Honestly, this lightbox was a great investment. Our product photography is all over the place... the image I replaced was an oblique angled shot from above.  Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:51, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    My small lightbox was itself a great step up over pieces of paper and a bendy desk lamp. JayCubby 18:55, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support ArionStar (talk) 01:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Very nice product photography! —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Brenizer method

Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2026 at 16:33:47 (UTC)

Original – An example of the Brenzier digital photographic method, in which the appearance of large-format film is recreated through panoramic stitching
Reason
Excellent EV for its article and all-around good aesthetic and technical composition
Articles in which this image appears
Brenizer method
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
Creator
Joe St. Pierre

Seattle Downtown Aerial, July 2025 (zoomed)

Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2026 at 03:55:10 (UTC)

Original – Drone photo of downtown Seattle, as seen from above Queen Anne Hill
Reason
Lede image of the articles Seattle, Downtown Seattle, and Seattle metropolitan area, and bonus points for being an aerial photo.
Articles in which this image appears
Seattle, Downtown Seattle, Seattle metropolitan area, List of cities in the United States with the most skyscrapers
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Urban
Creator
Spicypepper999
  • Support as nominator↠Pine () 03:55, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support – Excellent photo with good EV. Northern-Virginia-Photographer (talk) 12:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support   Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:24, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support – I will note that it's below 1500px on the y axis. That doesn't bother me, but it might be a sticking point for some. Moonreach (talk) 18:55, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportVulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support It could be bigger, EXIF... --Petar Milošević (talk) 18:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Guercino

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 23:55:45 (UTC)

Original – Self-portrait of Italian Baroque painter Guercino
Reason
EV and HQ
Articles in which this image appears
Guercino, 1591 and 1590s
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists
Creator
Guercino
  • Support as nominatorArionStar (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment: is this scan from a book? the source says "Turner, Nicolas: The paintings of Guercino : a revised and expanded catalogue raisonné, Roma 2017, p. 557". A direct scan of the painting would be preferable. ―Howard🌽33 00:09, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    Indeed it is. Screening artifacts are visible at high zoom. JayCubby 20:24, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Indian Ocean oriental sweetlips

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 19:36:21 (UTC)

Original – Adult Indian Ocean oriental sweetlips, Anilao, Philippines.
Reason
Unanimously featured on Commons. Infobox image.
Articles in which this image appears
Indian Ocean oriental sweetlips
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Creator
Diego Delso
  • Support as nominatorMER-C 19:36, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support one of few where WB is OK. --Petar Milošević (talk) 12:49, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    WB? Moonreach (talk) 13:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    I think he means white balance. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:07, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    Yes, white-balance. We have more on Commons, and WB is problem on many, but here is OK. --Petar Milošević (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support  Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support lede image in the article, clear enough, and bonus points for underwater photography. ↠Pine () 04:10, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Ak-kalpak

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 19:33:53 (UTC)

Original – Kyrgyz man with ak-kalpak ("white-kalpak") hat, made of wool. Mens national hat of Kyrgyzstan.
Reason
Unanimously featured on Commons. Infobox image. UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage.
Articles in which this image appears
Ak-kalpak, Kyrgyz people
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
Creator
Petar Milošević
  • Support as nominatorMER-C 19:33, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Good, reading my mind MER-C. Definately FP. --Petar Milošević (talk) 12:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportMoonreach (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support  Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportVulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:08, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Well composed and interesting photo with good EV. Nick-D (talk) 06:07, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support – ―Howard🌽33 22:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Johnny "Guitar" Watson

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 13:04:36 (UTC)

OriginalJohnny "Guitar" Watson performing live at Bielefeld, Germany, 1987
Reason
HQ photo from concert showing "Guitar" Watson with guitar
Articles in which this image appears
Johnny "Guitar" Watson
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator
Mika Väisänen

Obama and the MythBusters

Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 22:45:38 (UTC)

Original – President Barack Obama (left) meeting with MythBusters co-hosts Jamie Hyneman (center) and Adam Savage (right) in the White House in 2010.
Alt 1
Reason
Professional White House photograph of then-president Barack Obama meeting with Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage of the TV show MythBusters. High EV for the show, and an interesting cultural snapshot in the tradition of the Elvis/Nixon photo. This image already has a crop that's been in use for a while, so I've nominated both.
Articles in which this image appears
Original: Jamie Hyneman; Alt 1: MythBusters
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator
Chuck Kennedy, White House photographer
  • Support (either) as nominatorMoonreach (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose Due to crop on both. --Petar Milošević (talk) 12:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    The first one came that way. For that one, do you mean "crop" in the framing sense, or is there some less-cropped original? Moonreach (talk) 14:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    I think on all, they bodies are choped rather than "nice crop", they are not like a buste (sculpture). --Petar Milošević (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose messy background and the crop that tries to solve it ends up too tight. not enough wow factor to overcome issues.©Geni (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose – uninteresting composition ―Howard🌽33 00:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose while a meeting between public figures is somewhat interesting, I don't think that this adds a lot of EV, and I concur that this isn't aesthetically great. ↠Pine () 04:03, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Ahu Tongariki

Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 18:56:55 (UTC)

Original – Located on Rapa Nui, or Easter Island, Ahu Tongariki features 15 Moai statues that face the sunset during the winter solstice.
Reason
Provides lots of EV to the article by showing both a close-up of the Travelling Moai and the 15 Moai of Ahu Tongariki.
Articles in which this image appears
Ahu Tongariki
FP category for this image
Could either go in several categories, but I think Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes is best, for also featuring the island landscape.
Creator
Bjørn Christian Tørrissen
  • Nominated byRedRampageRuckusRaider (talk) 18:56, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose – This is a well-composed shot taken by a camera that wasn't up to the task. The out-of-focus area in the background is smudgy rather than just being soft, and I see color fringing where the hillside and the foreground moai meet the sky. Moonreach (talk) 22:31, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Shale

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 02:45:49 (UTC)

Original – A shale formation at Marble Canyon, Kootenay National Park, British Columbia. Shale is a fine-grained, clastic sedimentary rock formed from mud that is a mix of flakes of clay minerals.
Reason
High quality image showing layers and layers of shale. Stable in article for almost a year. Featured on Commons
Articles in which this image appears
shale
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology
Creator
  Chris Woodrich (talk)

Nominations — to be closed

Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.

Older nominations requiring additional input from users

These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.

Closing procedure

A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js

When NOT promoted, perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.

When promoted, perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
    • Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
    Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. Add the image to:
  3. Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
    The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
  4. Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
  5. Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
  6. If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
  7. Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
  8. If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

  1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
  2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the March archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
  3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Delist closing procedure

Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.

If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:

  1. Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
  2. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  3. Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.

If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
  3. Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.

If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
    • Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
  2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
  3. Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
  4. Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
  5. Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

  1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
  2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
  3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Recently closed nominations

Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.

Grey Bushchat (Saxicola ferreus) female

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 07:52:17 (UTC)

Original – Grey Bushchat (Saxicola ferreus) female in Sillery Gaon, West Bengal, India.
Reason
Featured on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Grey bush chat
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
Tisha Mukherjee
  • Support as nominatorParamanu Sarkar (talk) 07:52, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose Stub article, unappealing light. kallerna 21:07, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support - Article length is not one of the criteria (might block it from running as POTD, but that's a different process). Plain lighting allows for a focus on the animal.   Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:40, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 20:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportVulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:59, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Agassiz and the radiates

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 23:03:31 (UTC)

Original – Biologist Jean Louis Agassiz standing before chalkboard drawings of animals he grouped into Radiata, a taxonomic rank later discounted because its subjects are not monophyletic.
Reason
Fascinating period photo of a 19th century biologist and a taxonomic rank he proposed for the animal kingdom. Technical quality is a bit rough, but the source is from c. 1870 and I think Materialscientist's restoration cleans it up as much as possible without impacting the historical detail.
Articles in which this image appears
Radiata, Louis Agassiz, The eclipse of Darwinism
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology
Creator
Photographer unknown, restoration by Materialscientist
  • Support as nominatorMoonreach (talk) 23:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Was wondering if this was one of MS' halftoning fixes, but it does look like the original source was like that.   Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportVulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 10:41, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Tentative oppose: needs a complete file description per WP:WIAFP #7 (feel free to strike out this vote when this is addressed.) ―Howard🌽33 12:24, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
    Would you consider it acceptable if I just copied the description I wrote for this nomination to the Wikimedia page? Moonreach (talk) 22:32, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
    Sure. ―Howard🌽33 00:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Alright, done! Moonreach (talk) 13:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 23:57, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust The Homunculus 23:57, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Chamaecyparis lawsoniana

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 11:38:43 (UTC)

Original – Cypress cones of a Chamaecyparis lawsoniana.
Reason
Unanimously featured on Commons. Adds value to article.
Articles in which this image appears
Chamaecyparis lawsoniana
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others
Creator
Agnes Monkelbaan
  • Support as nominatorMER-C 11:38, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support  Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Thank you for the nomination.----Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:34, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
    Struck vote as user doesn't has the required number of edits (has only 19 instead of 100). Armbrust The Homunculus 23:32, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
    Good evening, I think there's a misunderstanding. I've posted thousands of high-quality photos on Wiki. Greetings from Agnes Monkelbaan. Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Agnes Monkelbaan: For this only edits to English Wikipedia count, and here you have only 20 so far. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 21:07, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
    Good morning Armbrust, Thanks for the explanation. I thought Wiki was one big family and not separate kingdoms. Greetings from Friesland. Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose – the cones are just a little too close in color (even with proper screen settings) to the background for me to support. That being said, only weakly opposing, because otherwise a perfect picture that fits criteria. Northern-Virginia-Photographer (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support — I like the green, myself. Moonreach (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose Per Northern-Virginia-Photographer, also seems to be oversaturated and IMO the crop is unbalanced. kallerna 21:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Definitely deserves a star --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Tomato clownfish

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 11:19:01 (UTC)

Original – Tomato clownfish (Amphiprion frenatus) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines
Reason
Featured on Commons, infobox image.
Articles in which this image appears
Tomato clownfish
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Creator
Diego Delso
  • Support as nominatorMER-C 11:19, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose Awkward POV, should not be infobox img kallerna 12:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment - I like the POV - I think you get a good look at more of the fish this way - but it's off-center in the frame. I'd support a crop. Moonreach (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak support I also like the POV. I think the unusual angle is what makes it eye-catching. Cropping could help. Barbalalaika 🐌 19:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Ramadan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2026 at 04:26:53 (UTC)

Original – Men breaking their fast during iftar in Dubai's Grand Mosque
Reason
EV
Articles in which this image appears
Ramadan
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology
Creator
Gabby Canonizado
  • Support as nominatorArionStar (talk) 04:26, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support, though I think this would also have great EV at iftar.  Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:59, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment Nice photo (especially as it illustrates how iftar dinners often bring people of diverse backgrounds together), but the composition is a bit awkward as the food isn't clearly shown - this limits the EV. A photo not taken at ground level seems superior. Nick-D (talk) 23:19, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support, as per Chris Woodrich Northern-Virginia-Photographer (talk) 17:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment I think crop on right side to put pair in the middle would be good. Also putting steps to be horizontal would be good. Too bad its croped, to show they put shoes off, which is their tradition. On the end, maybe Aperture could be lowered a bit. f/2.8 is wide open, sharpness ? --Petar Milošević (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 04:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust The Homunculus 04:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Quadeca (2024)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2026 at 04:11:18 (UTC)

Original – A cropped image of American musician Quadeca playing guitar at a concert in 2024
Reason
This black-and-white portrait is of exceptional quality, creating good black-and-white contrast, clearly has the main subject in focus as he passionately performs with his guitar under good lighting, capturing Quadeca's spirit.
Articles in which this image appears
Quadeca, Vanisher, Horizon Scraper
FP category for this image
People/Entertainment
Creator
Benmode2012 (original uncropped photo)
  • Support as nominatorRTSthestardust (talk) 04:11, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment – I'm not sure this uses the full dynamic range. Even the places where the light reflects directly off metal, like his ring and the guitar frets, look light gray rather than white. Moonreach (talk) 22:40, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 04:26, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Delist: Sitting Bull

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2026 at 23:35:15 (UTC)

Cabinet card portrait of Sitting Bull
Reason
Below FP resolution standards, superseded by better lead image at the main article, and at this point its only used in one semi-related article now.
Articles this image appears in
Isaiah Dorman
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sitting Bull
Nominator
User:Spikebrennan

Delisted --Armbrust The Homunculus 00:30, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Miguel Nicolelis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2026 at 16:29:22 (UTC)

OriginalMiguel Nicolelis in 2011
Reason
HQ
Articles in which this image appears
Miguel Nicolelis
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator
Campus Party Brasil
  • Support as nominatorArionStar (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose Useful photo, but provides no indication at all of why this person is notable - it's just a generic academic-style head shot. There's also an odd blur just above his head. Nick-D (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose: Too blurry around the edges of his face. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 15:46, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 19:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Ruins of Oradour-sur-Glane

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2026 at 16:21:00 (UTC)

Original – The ruins of Oradour-sur-Glane, a French town punitively destroyed by the Germans in World War II, as they stood in 2017.
Reason
Interesting snapshot of a town destroyed in World War II. The abandoned car in the foreground helps date it, and the photo is used to illustrate not only the page of the town but the page for modern ruins as a whole. Awarded first prize in the national contest of France in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.
Articles in which this image appears
Oradour-sur-Glane, modern ruins
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator
Davdavlhu

Promoted File:Village martyr d'Oradour-sur-Glane 10.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 16:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Tony Blair (2010)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2026 at 02:10:51 (UTC)

Original – Tony Blair in 2010
Reason
The image is of exceptional technical standard, it is of acceptable resolution, it is very eye-drawing, Creative Commons Licensed, and the description is acceptable. It provides good encyclopedic value as it comes from when Blair was working with The Quartet for negotiations over Palestine, something he has been consistently involved with throughout his life.
Articles in which this image appears
Tony Blair
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator
Pavel Golovkin
  • Support as nominatorGamerwierdo100 (talk) 02:10, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support JJARichardson (talk) 02:14, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose – a photo from during his premiership (1997 to 2007) is preferable. ―Howard🌽33 11:46, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment – The composition is good but the subject is overlit; the highlights are blown out and his skin looks almost greasy because of it. Moonreach (talk) 16:14, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 02:28, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Pink Pills for Pale People

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2026 at 14:45:50 (UTC)

Original – A bottle of Dr. Williams' Pink Pills for Pale People, a patent medicine whose iron-rich formula was claimed to cure anemia, among a host of other ills.
Reason
Good specimen image of the product (a now-extinct patent medicine) in its packaging. If I had to nit-pick, it would have been nice to get focus-stacked images, since the box in the background is slightly soft, but the bottle and its contents are the main subject and they look great.
Articles in which this image appears
Dr. Williams' Pink Pills for Pale People, Iron supplement, List of patent medicines, Iron preparation
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Other, I think. Although taken orally, the Pink Pills are not food, so they don't belong in /Food and Drink, and as they weren't a true medicine, they don't belong in /Science, either. When I nominated the Bile Beans bag, I recommended /Culture, but that was a piece of advertising, whereas this is the actual product.
Creator
Science Museum, London; via the Wellcome Collection website. The Wellcome page has been deleted, but the source, including license, is archived here. The credit citation given there is: "Dr Williams' 'Pink Pills', London, England, 1850-1920. Credit: Science Museum, London. CC BY"

Promoted File:Dr Williams' 'Pink Pills', London, England, 1850-1920 Wellcome A627306.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 16:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

USS Zumwalt acceptance trials

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2026 at 05:40:42 (UTC)

OriginalUSS Zumwalt during her acceptance trials in 2016.
Reason
Engaging contrast between the sharp lines of Zumwalt and the ocean with a visually interesting wake behind her.
Articles in which this image appears
USS Zumwalt, Zumwalt-class destroyer, Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, Trump-class battleship, List of destroyer classes of the United States Navy, List of equipment of the United States Navy, List of equipment of the United States Armed Forces
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water#Military
Creator
US Navy
  • Support as nominatorGGOTCC 05:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportMoonreach (talk) 14:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Excellent image that clearly depicts this ship's radical design upon delivery. It's been modified a fair bit since then. Nick-D (talk) 03:36, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Northern-Virginia-Photographer (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
  • comment lot of noise on the hull for a 5D Mark III at 250ISO.©Geni (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose per Geni. MER-C 19:19, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support  Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support. Matarisvan (talk) 07:24, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Promoted File:USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 08:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Eternal Flame Falls

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2026 at 01:14:33 (UTC)

Original – Eternal Flame Falls is a small waterfall complemented with a naturally fueled flame located in Chestnut Ridge Park in New York.
Reason
This video adds a lot of depth to the article and is of great quality.
Articles in which this image appears
Eternal Flame Falls
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others
Creator
G. Edward Johnson, uses Lorax
  • Nominated byRedRampageRuckusRaider (talk) 01:14, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support — I think the camera is slightly crooked in the second shot, given that the drops seem to fall diagonally, but overall this is great EV. I'd never heard of the Eternal Flame Falls; now I feel like I understand exactly what they are. Moonreach (talk) 14:58, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support – ―Howard🌽33 16:05, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support - Glad people like it. Also I'll note that this is an 8k video, so if monitors ever get above 4k this will still look good. Lorax (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you so much for the support and for creating this beautiful video! RedRampageRuckusRaider (talk) 03:14, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support Northern-Virginia-Photographer (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportHamid Hassani (talk) 05:27, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support slightly annoying fly above the flame around the two second mark but otherwise great. Don't have an 8K monitor to hand to check that though but holds up fine up to 4K.©Geni (talk) 17:45, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
    Nobody has an 8K monitor, so I wouldn't worry too much about that. Moonreach (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 19:17, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Promoted File:Burning Eternal Flame Falls Chestnut Ridge Park NY 2025-09.webm --Armbrust The Homunculus 03:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

The Goddess Bhairavi Devi with Shiva

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2026 at 14:26:01 (UTC)

OriginalThe Goddess Bhairavi Devi with Shiva, c.1630–35, Mughal painting by Payag. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Reason
Good quality image of a painting from 1630s, currently at the Met.
Articles in which this image appears
The Goddess Bhairavi Devi with Shiva
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology
Creator
Payag

Promoted File:The Goddess Bhairavi Devi with Shiva MET DP257990.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 18:47, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Suspended nominations

This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.

Abbey Road

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2026 at 19:27:29 (UTC)

Original – Front cover of Abbey Road by The Beatles. The view really is Abbey Road, London, NW8 looking north. The gates of the Abbey Road Studios are behind the white VW Beetle on the left.
Reason
Featured on Commons, was opposed on quality reasons but would be a better fit here for obvious EV.
Articles in which this image appears
Abbey Road, The Beatles etc
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator
John Kosh (album design), Iain Macmillan (photograph)
  • Support as nominatorMER-C 19:27, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support A high quality render of the The Beatles (album) cover would also make a good FP candidate. JJARichardson (talk) 20:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment Extremely high EV, obviously, but I'm doubtful of the claim that this is out of copyright in the US given that the source cited on Commons is a random Ebay listing for LPs of the album. As the image was a commercial shot for the album and was used as its cover, a much better source seems necessary. Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
    No deletion discussions so far (somehow), but image appeared to pass the Commons FA nom without anybody raising doubts about the PD status. If you personally have serious doubts it may be worth considering nominating for deletion. ―Howard🌽33 18:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
    Even within that listing, I don't see anything that says this image is out of copyright. Moonreach (talk) 19:53, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
    @Moonreach: the rationale is that since the US publication of the cover was simultaneous with the UK publication, and the US cover did not bear a valid separate copyright notice for the cover, it is in the public domain in the US. ―Howard🌽33 23:44, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
    I don't have any direct evidence to the contrary, so I won't vote against it, but on a gut level I feel like this fails WP:SNOWBALL. I can't seriously believe that one of the most famous images connected to the most famous rock band was accidentally published without copyright. The problem is that I don't know what the image's official name was at the time it was taken, or who the copyright would have gone to (the photographer, the album designer, the record label, the producer?) which precludes me from looking it up in the copyright records. As a picture from 1969, it wouldn't have been subject to the 27-year renewal, which means any records (if they exist) would be in hard-to-search book records. Moonreach (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
    Yes, that's also my concern here. The image may well be out of copyright in the US due to a stuff up by the record company or whoever originally owned the photo, but this needs to be properly established. Relying on a single Ebay listing as the source for being out of copyright doesn't seem OK for FP status. For instance, how can we be sure that the image hasn't been edited to remove the copyright notice?, how do we know for sure that it's actually a US edition of the album?, etc. Nick-D (talk) 23:48, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
    Like I said, if you either of you have concerns regarding copyright, you should nominate the image for deletion as there doesn't appear to have been a previous deletion nomination. ―Howard🌽33 14:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
    I have concerns but I can't think of a way to verify them, short of Wikipedia getting a cease-and-desist order. I don't like that the permission is still an eBay listing; even if that were a trustworthy resource, which it's not, I couldn't find anything on there that said "the cover of Abbey Road is public domain." Additionally, the copyright tags that have been added since this nomination was made conflict with each other. One says copyright was in South Africa first, another says that it was in the UK and South Africa simultaneously. All of this feels dubious to me, I just don't think I can meet the burden of proof for a deletion nomination. Moonreach (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
    For what its worth, on Commons the burden of proof for keeping a file typically lies with those supporting to keep the file in the first place. Per c:COM:PCP, even a "significant doubt" about the freedom of the file warrants its deletion. Personally I'm on the fence about the freedom of the album cover, and I don't feel confident in giving my opinion one way or the other about it. ―Howard🌽33 21:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
    I've nominated this for deletion at Commons. I hope that this leads to a strong source establishing that the image is out of copyright becoming available, but if not there are some risks around Commons hosting this image that need to be considered by the community there. Nick-D (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
    Thanks for that, I've weighed in there. Moonreach (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 09:49, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportGstaveeiffel314 (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support ArionStar (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Support as nominator on Commons. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:53, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose – image seems quite pixelated looking closely. is this the best scan possible? ―Howard🌽33 23:51, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportRTSthestardust (talk) 03:56, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
  • SupportHamid Hassani (talk) 05:30, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose Due to my concerns over copyright as noted above. Nick-D (talk) 23:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose due to the same concerns as Nick. I think the technical quality is acceptable, but I worry about legal exposure. Moonreach (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Postpone closure until the deletion request on Commons concludes. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 21:04, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI