User talk:U4ick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
September 2025
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Decapitation have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Decapitation was changed by U4ick (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898074 on 2025-09-16T09:11:38+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Espen Aalberg have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Espen Aalberg was changed by U4ick (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879794 on 2025-09-20T06:05:45+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Biden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:53, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi U4ick! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict, which includes discussing articles on talk pages, unless you are logged into an account that is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!
Happy editing!
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Burrobert (talk) 04:13, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Dave Rubin when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicolae Ceaușescu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great National Assembly. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Elena Ceaușescu, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:32, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Magnus Birgersson
What were you trying to achieve at Magnus Birgersson (1300-1320)? The original version had 12 sourced paragraphs, and your initial replacement only five, with an unnecessary commentary section on the used sources. This version also had broken references, LLM-style. The references look good, but the links do not point to the intended pages. The formatting was also broken. You have to be more careful in using LLM. I am happy to see that you reverted yourself, but moved the content to your sandbox. However, in the sandbox you cite Jerker Rosen's dissertation. I don't believe you've suddenly read it, so please don't make false citations. In any case, you need to provide pages numbers when citing books.
In general, please don't make such drastic replacements of article content, but instead try to make incremental changes, adding and refining content instead of removing it. Only unsourced content can be removed without discussion. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 04:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
You have been dropping large chunks of text obviously pulled from LLMs such as this, this, and this with links that do not work. This violated the core policy of verifiability and, because of the lack of human review of the AI model, the chance of AI "hallucinations" (hoaxes) are high.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
To reviewing admins. I have no opposition to unblocking if this user if they promise to stop using AI to edit articles. --Guerillero Parlez Moi 08:49, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.