User talk:Uchu40

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Google Easter eggs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Google Easter eggs was changed by Uchu40 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875408 on 2017-01-09T23:14:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hatsune Miku, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC) I have to inform you that the information comes from a very dedicated and trustworthy source. Infact the link is right here http://kamenrider.wikia.com/wiki/Asuna_Karino. I am sorry if this has caused any inconvenience. I have also made the comment on my own talk pagemas I cannot access yours. Uchu 40

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Chapter VII of the Constitution of Australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Smjg (talk) 16:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Balloon boy hoax, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – The Grid (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that in this edit to The Greatest Hero of Them All, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 06:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

I’ve retracted the warning because I can see that there’s a basis in comics continuity for considering Catherine Hamilton-Kane as a distinct character from Kathy Kane. The source I cited mentioned that the TV series adapted the character. However, while the Catherine character was introduced in 2012 after a DC reboot, I see that the Kathy character made an appearance in the main continuity after this. As such, there are two characters with almost the name that are the aunt of Bruce Wayne by marriage. Whether or not this is the product of lack of oversight by DC editors, it isn’t indisputable that they are the same character. You’ll understand the confusion. It may be necessary to mention Catherine in the Kathy article because of the sheer convolution involved. Swordofneutrality (talk) 14:10, 12 December 2025 (UTC)