User talk:Urayahahah

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to RPK-74N have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: RPK-74N was changed by Urayahahah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973858 on 2025-11-01T10:11:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at RPK-74M. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: RPK-74M was changed by Urayahahah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975221 on 2025-11-01T10:11:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Mozilla Corporation into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 10:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please note that indiscriminate collections of gallery images are not allowed. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:36, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Haenel MK 556, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 01:45, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of Draft:Criticism of Mozilla by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Criticism of Mozilla Corporation. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey there. I think rather than have the main article for the notable events sub-section be Criticism of Mozilla Corporation, it'd make sense to have a smaller section on the page (e.g. 'Criticism') with a summary of the criticism article. The main article template is typically used for sections that are entirely covered by another page Viv Desjardin (talk, contrib) 18:24, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article QN-202 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QN-202 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

There is a formal process for discussion of redirects which we expect users to follow. Please do not revert further without discussion. 23:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC) ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Please do not unnecessarily split articles that do not have sufficient content to merit a standalone article; particularly when the subject is merely a variant or licensed copy of the original and there's little or no new content that could be added that would not be also relevant to the main article. When considering a split, consideration must be given to size, notability and potential neutrality issues before proposing or carrying out a split and in a number of cases I've seen lately from you that does not appear to have been done.⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 21:15, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Urayahahah. Thank you for your work on 2020 German Assault Rifle System tender. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Needs copyedited and polished a bit. Needs more sections. Its almost unreadable.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 15:24, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Browning Hi-Power, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2025 (UTC)