User talk:Volatileacid

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 60 days are automatically archived 2 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Welcome!

Hello, Volatileacid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using Volatileacid (talk) 20:33, 14 October 2025 (UTC); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Please use edit summaries and the Show preview button more often. Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 09:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Thankyouthankyouthankyou. That looooong, ugly, POV plot "summary" has to go. Granted, the version you entered was equally POV and full of slang, but it was a good start. Unfortunately, I have to revert this.WP:COPYRIGHT#Using_copyrighted_work_from_others Would you be willing to re-write it (to avoid the copyright violation, POV and slang issues)? Mdbrownmsw (talk) 06:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on MMSC track, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jpeeling (talk) 12:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:20091104083142!Amitabh Bachchan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. December21st2012Freak ^{Lord of the Vulcans} 03:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Akmal Shaikh. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NW (Talk) 03:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Search for extraterrestrial intelligence, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 13:46, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Please note that a source like is not a wp:reliable source. DVdm (talk) 13:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Volatileacid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ayyagari Ramachandra Rao".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 1919 England riots. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 01:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/1919-race-riots/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:1919 England riots may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Volatileacid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

• Note: Copying from freely licensed sources is acceptable, but you must provide attribution. I have done so for you in this edit. If you do copy from a freely licensed source in the future, you can use that edit as an example to follow, or if you are unsure of how to do it, ask at the Tea Hopuse. -- Whpq (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I accepted your draft above. I wanted to point you to this interesting collection of newspaper articles on the race riots in the United Kingdom that you could use to improve the article. https://blog.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/2022/10/26/the-1919-race-riots-in-britain/

I hope you continue to improve the Wikipedia article as this is a valuable topic. Let me know if you need any help writing it. This isn't an automated message. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 13:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

From one Volatile to another, just wanted to stop by and say hi. Crazy that you've been editing Wikipedia since 2006! VolatileAnomaly (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Haha, hey there! Thanks for the message. From one Volatile to another, it's great to hear from you. It's certainly been a journey since '06! Take care. Volatileacid (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 15:17, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

You are making untrue statements at Jon Jones. Please stop or you will be reported. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 16:14, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello GOAT Bones231012,

Thanks for your message and for your passion for keeping the Jon Jones article accurate.

I believe you're referring to the information that was recently in the article about a supposed fight in November 2024. You are correct that this information was untrue. It was based on speculative or incorrect sources and was added in error.

My goal is the same as yours: to make sure the information is accurate and well-sourced. Thanks again for pointing out the error.

Best Regards.

Volatileacid (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

It’s not a "supposed fight". The fight happened. Jon Jones fought Stipe Miocic in November 2024. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi; have you been using an LLM (such as ChatGPT) to assist in making some of your recent edits? Perryprog (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for reaching out. Yeah, I've recently used AI tools on occasion when putting articles together - mainly for organising info I've already researched. But the actual writing and all the fact-checking is mine. Everything gets verified against proper sources and fully cited before it goes in. I'm aware AI makes stuff up, which is why I don't trust it for actual content - just use it as a sort of drafting tool. I do my own research, check everything, then write it properly to meet Wikipedia's standards. From what I understand, Wikipedia's main concern is the quality and accuracy of what ends up in articles, not really how it was drafted. Volatileacid (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Did you check everything in this edit? Perryprog (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I'm very busy, you're going to have to be specific. And it was a very long time ago (15 months) Volatileacid (talk) 20:34, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Well, it's straining my credulity when you say that you're verifying everything against proper sources and is fully cited when every single citation in that edit refers to non-existent sources, including websites that have never even been registered. Perryprog (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2025 (UTC)