User talk:Winking-Pass

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page OECD was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the list of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ... discospinster _talk 02:33, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to OECD. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Nick-D (talk) 09:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

In addition, please stop inserting a link from ChatGPT to Kumiharu Shigehara. Orange sticker (talk) 11:51, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Orange sticker: do you have a diff link for this (or was it deleted under G15)? --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I think it's been deleted. It was a plain text url in the body of the article with source=ChatGPT in it. Orange sticker (talk) 09:55, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kumiharu Shigehara—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at Kumiharu Shigehara, you may be blocked from editing. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 12:32, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Winking-Pass. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to 重原久美春, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Winking-Pass. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Winking-Pass|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

This looks like a recreation of an article that I had previously draftified. That always seems overly persistent to me, like the editor is laser focused on getting someone's name into Wikipedia. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 12:23, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Gurkubondinn I looked at that article as well, assumed good faith because the subject does seem to easily pass notability, but I don't think the editor has the competence to create an article. Orange sticker (talk) 13:02, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kumiharu Shigehara, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:05, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Kumiharu Shigehara, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Winking-Pass, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Winking-Pass|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Kumiharu Shigehara. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:47, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Kumiharu Shigehara. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 12:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs sourcing, no sources = no article. And the sources need to do two things: be inline to verify all facts, and to also demonstrate notability. That often needs WP:GOLDENRULE to be shown 3 times over. Alternatively if the subject's books have received indepth independent reviews, then those reviews can support WP:NAUTHOR. Ideally this would be 2 books, 2 reviews each, 4 in all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kumiharu Shigehara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Winking-Pass! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kumiharu Shigehara. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 19:27, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Winking-Pass. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page 重原久美春, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Kumiharu Shigehara. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and This should go through AfC to establish notability etc. You already have one draft there, this is a duplicate. . I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 12:27, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Gurkubondinn: - this has been created again by the editor - see Kumiharu Shigehara Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:05, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Spiderone: yup, I just noticed that. And I agree with Orange sticker about the lack of competence here. I think that this should probably be draftified or G15, and the main space page protected or salted. Otherwise this will probably go on for a while, unless someone blocks Winking-Pass, who hasn't replied to a single question or concern here. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I wonder if this could/should be reported to WP:AIV maybe ? --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Gurkubondinn it's not blatant enough vandalism for AIV but WP:ANI may be needed. Let's see if they respond soon. I've issued 1 COI warning and 3 UPE warnings which they have ignored so far. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:21, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Spiderone: unfortunately I agree with you on AIV (and I am never keen on filing an ANI), so I have placed LLM and UPE tags on the latest reincarnation of the main space article. Maybe that will get their attention. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Well they certainly noticed: Diff/1342421192. Let's see if they discover their user talk or not. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:47, 8 March 2026 (UTC)