User talk:Wmjames

I saw your comment on the GA nomination. One of the requirements is to make certain you have inline citations^[1] on either every line or paragraph. You can look this up in WP:MOS and it can give you information on how to do this. I can help you on this if needed. 23:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

(Sorry about that). Chris (talk) 23:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• You will need to see WP:CITE. This will give you guidelines on citing articles, including how to do inline citations. I could not think of it originally on how to do this when you issued your comments in the edit summary yesterday. Sorry about that. Chris (talk) 15:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

The article William Underwood Company you nominated as a good article has failed , see Talk:William Underwood Company for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 09:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the Goldblith book, I have that book at home and will put in the links if you give me the chance to do so. I will revert your previous edit to keep the Goldblith book in there until I can get the inline citations because it does mention the William Underwood Company at length. Chris (talk) 00:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Never mind. I see you have already done so. I can clean this up for you though if you would like. Disregard previous message. Chris (talk) 00:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

If you are planning on putting in images, please read WP:IMAGE. This will give you information on image copyright tags and how to put them in correctly. That you help you. Chris (talk) 19:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't mind you tagging the article for reassessment. I think it has contracted considerable cruft since it originally achieve GA status. I wouldn't mind a mass reversion to the original GA version, as suggested by SimonLyall here. We could then re-incorporating important new additions individually, while adding citations. --April Arcus (talk) 07:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Nice work! I wanted to do a Nobska article awhile back, but ran out of steam. I'm glad you did it! I've got a few photos of her around here, but I'll have to check the copyright status. Cbaer (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Generally articles are graded on the information that you mentioned and the article paragraphs. The article is really short when the templates, citations, and infobox are removed. To improve it, I would add more and feel free to upgrade it yourself. If ou look at the Cape Cod Project, you'll see that it is a small project and 99% of those articles were tagged by me. I was doing so many bot-like edits that after a while it started to get to the point where a quick look at the article would suffice. I know that there are others out there that should probably have their class changed but thats for another person since I generally am generous when it comes to things like that. Thanks though for the heads up though on the tagging of that article. I'll probably check out the others soon. Please feel free to join the CC Project though. You'll be much appreciated. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

On 30 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nobska (steamship), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Congrats! Chris (talk) 18:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Hooray! Go, team! --Wmjames (talk) 19:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at Riick's talk page. Message added 19:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC). Hello. You have a new message at Riick's talk page. Message added 05:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC). Hello. You have a new message at Riick's talk page. Message added 04:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC).

I just lumped all the Naushon photos together into the same category (commons:category:SS Nantucket (1957)), but I couldn't add yours since it's in Wikipedia not in Wikimedia Commons. How would you feel about adding it to Wikimedia Commons? Riick (talk) 16:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Sure, if I have the time to figure out how to do that, I am not against it, the problem is it doesn't seem pressing to me so I might not get around to it.--Wmjames (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Wmjames. No need for snark in an edit summary (though I've been guilty of that myself, I'm afraid, and I try to rein it in). The chicken spread was shown, but not the sardines. Perfectly valid to ask for a cite on that. Especially since "sardines" does sound like someone put it in as a joke! &nbsp: :) &nbsp:--Tenebrae (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I love that Wikipedia can get people talking about sardines! To this day I can't tell you difference between them and anchovies, though truth to tell, I haven't tried looking up either in Wikipedia.

Honestly, I don't believe I'm a lazy editor; I make about 100 edits a day and have totaled over 46,200. One can only do so much, and there's a reason the citation-requested tag template exists. But I hear you. And as long as I'm here, let me compliment you on your work at what I've discovered is an article that involves important discoveries in food technology. Who knew? I usually cover popular culture, but my wife found she had trouble locating Underwood deviled ham at our local supermarket and, well, you know how it goes when Wikipedia sucks you in! --Tenebrae (talk) 00:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I know! It kills me! Years ago I tried looking them up in a dictionary, and basically got "sardine: a type of anchovy-like edible little fish" and "anchovy: a sardine-like edible little fish"...!

Maybe we should team up, find scientific websites and settle the question once for all! But not tonight ... I'm bushed! --Tenebrae (talk) 01:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, I can't remember exactly — it's been a few years — but, yeah, dictionary definitions should be totally citable. I know they've been used at Superhero. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Wow, and that's the OAD! Still, this is the most promising definition I've heard so far — they're both herring, whatever herring are. I've never heard of alewives, though they sound saucy (hah!). Maybe an anchovy is what you get when you prepare herring a certain way? I'm really going to have to make time to delve into this... And yeah, sweet potato and yam ... I'm told there's a difference between possums and opossums as well.... --Tenebrae (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Underwood Deviled Ham label.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Your upload of File:AlfredEastonPoor.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:CharlesLanePoor.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Underwood Ham Label.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New Underwood.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)