Wikiwand AI

User talk:Yashsurya21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shrikant Vad moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shrikant Vad. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrikant Vad (July 16)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, RangersRus, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Shrikant Vad to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

RangersRus (talk) 12:29, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrikant Vad (July 23)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Nomadwikiholic1, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Shrikant Vad to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 15:28, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yashsurya21!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.
  • For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 15:28, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Shrikant Vad

Reason it was moved back to Draft:Shrikant Vad:

Since it was last declined, you made a minimal change and resubmitted it, failing to address the concerns of the reviewer.

I would ask you: what three sources do you feel meet all of the criteria in WP:Golden Rule? Before you answer, note that Times of India, which your draft relies heavily on, is considered to be of questionable reliability (see WP:RSP) and should not be considered in your answer. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 13:19, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

sir, i have inserted news from newspaper such as loksatta, maharashtra times, sakal, indian express and sir i have many secondary source [ news from newspaper which talks about only my draft] but they dont have url , as this news are from old newspaper [ 2000/2005] and i cant directly add images of this news, so its tough for me to get url's of this newspaper, and the information i have provided is true and real there is no fake or dishonest information. Yashsurya21 (talk) 17:26, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
You did not answer my question. I did not ask you about fake or dishonest information. I have asked you, specifically, which three sources meet all of the requirements described in WP:Golden Rule. Read that document. It is short. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 23:40, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Also, what is your association with Shrikant Vad? ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 23:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
@Anachronist I am his one of the student. Yashsurya21 (talk) 03:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
so do I have to make a complete new draft? Yashsurya21 (talk) 03:58, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
No, you have to find good sources. You still have not answered my question. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 10:35, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
@Anachronist sir, I have uploaded 3 news articles which talks directly on Shrikant Vad. 2 of them don't have URL so you cannot find in online as those were from 2000/2005. One is from Maharashtra Time.
I have a lot of old news which talks on shrikant vad but the problem is they don't have a URL. And there is no option to create a url or upload the newspaper image.
And also Shrikant Vad has received the highest award given by Maharashtra for a Coach. And he is a recognised figure in Maharshtra sports... Yashsurya21 (talk) 12:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Again, you have not answered my question. List the three sources that you believe meet the criteria in WP:Golden Rule, and explain why they meet the criteria if they are not online. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 01:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrikant Vad (August 9)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Greenman, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
See WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. Here, the early life section is almost entirely unsourced.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Shrikant Vad to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Greenman (talk) 00:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks