User talk:Yavneh

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Siege of Marinka. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adakiko (talk) 11:28, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

I am very sorry. So that’s why that keeps getting taken down. Thank you for letting me know. Yavneh (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Donetsk People's Republic. Tartan357 (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Tartan357 (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 20:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

I will reiterate the above notice; you are not permitted to edit any page or article on Wikipedia related to the Arab-Israeli conflict(which includes the war with Iran because the Iranian government backs Hamas/Hezbollah) until you have 500 edits; you are far from that level. Edit requests are only permitted if they are wholly uncontroversial, something that no reasonable person could disagree with, that requires little to no discussion. 331dot (talk) 01:03, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

I’m sorry, but my ‘edits’ are only on the talk page, where most users are not above 500 edits. For example @Nhals is only at 50 edits. There are even users who don’t even have accounts who have edited that specific talk page, such as in the “Remove Alireza Arafi” section. I wasn’t aware that even counted, and it certainly doesn’t seem enforced. Additionally, I don’t see how my edit request was something any reasonable person could disagree with. It was simply removing blatantly wrong and unsourced information. Yavneh (talk) 03:06, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, if you are going to, for whatever reason, tell me not to edit the talk page, please at least repost the discussions, as the issues with the article I mentioned were certainly valid. Yavneh (talk) 03:15, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

The article Ari Spitz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. feedmepaperr (talk) 01:52, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

You recently have made a number of content changes disguised as as "grammar" or "typo" fixes. 1 2 3 I suggest you stop this; this is deceptive editing. Cortador (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

In number one, it said Bennet initiate a commission instead of “said he would initiate.” That clearly is grammatical, and has nothing to do with the content.

In number two, it is not labeled as grammatical or a typo, it is labeled properly as fixing a content error.

In number three, I accidentally clicked on grammatical errors thinking I had hit “updated content.” I will be MUCH more careful in the future and thank you for bringing that to my attention. Yavneh (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2026 (UTC)